Language

The Climate Story for: Turkey

FIFA #22 | Elo #14

Group D

3 matches | 3 stadiums

Explore how heat could slow down performance for Turkey and how climate change is increasing the odds.

Matches

Turkey has completed its scheduled matches.

None of the group-stage matches that Turkey played had an above 50% likelihood of performance-impairing heat. Within their group, Turkey was the #3 team most at risk, with a 23% likelihood on average across their group-stage matches.

Potential routes

Paths to the final

Group D

See the potential road to victory for Turkey and the impact that heat may have on their prospects of winning. Group-stage match locations are fixed, and knockout match locations trace where Turkey could play as a group runner-up, third-place qualifier, or winner.

Actual routeTurkey's path ended in the group stage.The completed group-stage matches are highlighted below. Knockout branches remain visible as pre-tournament possibilities.
Color by

Chance of heat conditions that can slow player performance.

G1
G2
G3
R32
R16
QF
SF
Final
Winner
Roof + open air
Open air
Roof + open air
Runner-up
Roof + open air
Open air
Roof + open air
Third*
Roof + open air
Open air
Roof + open air

* Third-place qualification depends on results; only one possible R32 destination is shown.

Shareable graphics

Share

Group-round heat risk for Turkey

World Cup 2026 & Climate Change

Turkey flag

Turkey

Group DFIFA #22 | Elo #14

As of June 9, 2026

0 of 3 matches have above 50% odds of performance-impairing heat
  • “Performance-impairing heat” is heat above 28°C (82.4°F) — a threshold associated with elite players running slower, less far, and less often. Source: Climate Shift Index and ERA5 reanalysis.

Tournament path heat risk

World Cup 2026 & Climate Change

Turkey flag

Possible tournament paths

Turkey

Group DFIFA #22 | Elo #14

Chance of heat conditions that can slow player performance.

0 to 9%10 to 24%25 to 49%50 to 74%75 to 89%90%+
G1
G2
G3
R32
R16
QF
SF
Final
Winner
Jun 13M6Vancouver

Final: 2-0

Jun 19M31SF Bay Area

Final: 0-1

Jun 25M59Los Angeles

Final: 3-2

Jul 1M81SF Bay Area

Final: 2-0

Jul 6M94Seattle

Final: 1-4

Jul 10M98Los Angeles

Final: 2-1

Jul 14M101Dallas

Final: 0-2

Jul 19M104NY/NJ

Final: 1-0

Runner-up
Jun 13M6Vancouver

Final: 2-0

Jun 19M31SF Bay Area

Final: 0-1

Jun 25M59Los Angeles

Final: 3-2

Jul 3M88Dallas

Final: 1-1 (2-4 pens)

Jul 7M95Atlanta

Final: 3-2

Jul 11M100Kansas City

Final: 3-1

Jul 15M102Atlanta

Final: 1-2

Jul 19M104NY/NJ

Final: 1-0

Third*
Jun 13M6Vancouver

Final: 2-0

Jun 19M31SF Bay Area

Final: 0-1

Jun 25M59Los Angeles

Final: 3-2

Jun 29M74Boston

Final: 1-1 (3-4 pens)

Jul 4M89Philadelphia

Final: 0-1

Jul 9M97Boston

Final: 2-0

Jul 14M101Dallas

Final: 0-2

Jul 19M104NY/NJ

Final: 1-0

* Third-place qualification depends on results; only one possible R32 destination is shown.

“Performance-impairing heat” is heat above 28°C (82.4°F) — a threshold associated with elite players running slower, less far, and less often.

Based on Climate Shift Index and ERA5 reanalysis.