NewsApril 11, 2016

Carbon Pollution Seen As Key Driver of Sea Level Rise

John Upton

By John Upton

Follow @johnupton

As storm surges and floodwaters push further into neighborhoods from Miami to Melbourne, scientists have revealed how greenhouse gas pollution became the main cause of sea level rise during the late 20th century.

New computer modeling has shown that human influences were responsible for two-thirds of sea level rise from 1970 to 2005. By contrast, natural forces were responsible for about two-thirds of the rise in sea levels detected from 1900 to 1950.

Credit: Zach Frailey/flickr

Image

“We’re driving sea levels at the moment,” said Aimee Slangen, a researcher with Australia’s federal research agency, the CSIRO, who led the research. “As long as the greenhouse gases keep on rising, that means we will be causing most of the sea level rise.”

High-profile research published earlier this year showed 20th century pollution was mostly to blame for what was the steepest century of sea level rise in nearly 3,000 years analyzed.

The new study by an international team of scientists, published Monday in Nature Climate Change, used earth models to hone in on those changes. It compared the waning role of natural forces as the 20th century progressed — such as remnant melting of glaciers linked to the end of the little ice age — with the rising influence of human pollution on sea levels.

Click image to enlarge.

Image

The findings could help scientists narrow projections for the future. They’re also a reminder of the growing toll that industrial activity and modern lifestyles are taking at the planet’s shorelines, where flooding is becoming more regular, forcing a reimagination of urban design and raising questions about whether neighborhoods and villages will need to be abandoned.

Seas rose more than five inches in the 20th century, and the United Nations climate science body expects them to rise a couple more feet in the current century. A recent modeling study of the Antarctic ice sheet concluded sea levels could rise by several feet more than that this century unless fossil fuel use and deforestation are sharply and quickly curbed.

RELATEDAntarctica at Risk of Runaway Melting, Scientists Discover
Study Reveals Stunning Acceleration of Sea Level Rise
Mud Shortage Eroding California’s Climate Defenses

As the 20th century ticked past, from World War I through the rise of personal computers and synthesized pop music, the causes of sea-level rise changed profoundly.

Early in the century, glaciers were still melting as the planet adjusted to warmer temperatures following the little ice age of the 1500s to 1700s. Meanwhile, greenhouses gas pollution was trapping heat on earth, but soot and other pollution was reflecting it away.

Black line shows role of greenhouse gas pollution on sea level rise strengthened around 1970. (Colors show how the pollution affected sea level changes from different factors, such glacier melting in dark blue.)
Source: Slangen et al., “Anthropogenic forcing dominates global mean sea-level rise since 1970,” Nature Climate Change, 2016.

Image

Until around 1950, the effects of heat-reflecting pollution known as aerosols helped offset the sea-rising effects of heat-trapping greenhouse gas pollution, the modeling showed. Around 1970, the warming effects of greenhouse gas pollution ticked sharply upward — but the cooling effects of aerosols were diminished because of clean air laws in developed countries, leading to accelerated warming and sea level rise.

“What you’re seeing is the different timing of the impact of aerosols and greenhouse gases,” said John Church, a prominent CSIRO scientist who contributed to the research. He is part of a climate-research unit being targeted for heavy staff cuts, plans for which have triggered international condemnation of the Australian government.

“Burning of fossil fuels releases aerosols, which have an immediate but short-lived impact on radiative forcing,” Church said. “In contrast, greenhouse gases — with their long lifetime — take time to build up in the atmosphere.”

The eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines in the early 1990s released natural aerosols that slowed global warming. “This cooled the ocean and sea level fell,” Church said. “The climate system then recovered and sea level rose more rapidly.”

By comparing the results of their modeling, which included natural and human influences on temperatures and sea levels, including changes in solar radiation and volcanic eruptions, the researchers could account for about three-quarters of sea level rise detected in a century of tide gauge and other observations.

Black line shows effects of aerosol pollution on sea level change weakened around 1950.
Source: Slangen et al., “Anthropogenic forcing dominates global mean sea-level rise since 1970,” Nature Climate Change, 2016.

Image

The 24 percent difference between modeled and observed sea level rise could be due to errors in the records, to errors in the modeling results, or both. That the discrepancy declined over the 20th century suggests to the researchers that the flaws might be in the observations.

“Of course, I’d be happier if it was spot on,” said Ben Marzeion, a University of Bremen professor who contributed to the study. “I’m not worried that this weakens the conclusions of the paper, because this difference does not exist in the most recent decades, where we have the greatest confidence in the observations.”

Bob Kopp, a sea level scientist at Rutgers University who wasn’t involved with the new study, praised the research, which he said used established methods.

Kopp played down the differences between the modeled results and the sea level observations, noting the discrepancy would have been smaller if the researchers used a record of sea level observations that he considers more reliable.

“Punchline: humans became increasingly responsible for sea level rise over the course of the 20th century,” Kopp said.

You May Also Like:
Fishing Bans Can Protect Great Barrier Reef Corals
Clouds Play Lesser Role in Curbing Warming, Study Finds
Will La Niña Follow One of the Strongest Ever El Niños?