News Section
Stories from Climate Central's Science Journalists and Content Partners

NOAA Scientists Find No Clear Human Connection to Deadly 2010 Russian Heat Wave, But…

Repost This

Scientists see increasing risks of similar heat waves as the world warms

Amidst last summer’s record-breaking heat wave and wildfires that enveloped Western Russia in a noxious mix of haze and smoke, the question of what role climate change played was foremost on many people’s minds. Weeks of scorching temperatures and related wildfires, which caused thousands of deaths and damaged Russia's grain supply — putting a halt to exports and raising food prices worldwide — were unlike anything in recorded Russian history.

The 2010 Russian heat wave shattered temperature records, caused thousands of deaths, devastated wheat crops, and brought intense smog to Moscow. Credit: Boris SV/flickr.

According to a new study from scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the University of Colorado, Boulder, it was primarily natural atmospheric processes that caused the heat wave, and there was likely little human influence on this particular extreme event.

"The Russian heat wave was primarily due to a natural phenomenon called atmospheric blocking," explained Randall Dole, the lead author and deputy director of NOAA’s Earth System Research Laboratory in Boulder.

NOAA researchers studied both historical observations and computer model simulations to assess how much natural and human factors contributed to the extended bout of extreme heat. They found that an unusually intense area of high pressure helped cause a traffic jam of weather systems by acting as an atmospheric block, diverting weather systems around western Russia and leaving a record warm and dry airmass in place for more than a month. This particular blocking event was so large that it likely diverted cool air into southern Asia, increasing the intensity of the monsoon season around Pakistan and causing severe flooding (though the current study did not specifically examine the Pakistan floods). 

The results of the study were published today in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.

According to the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Fourth Assessment Report, the frequency of extreme heat events is expected to increase during this century as average global temperatures rise. Identifying the human influence in the behavior of extreme events, however, is still a relatively new area of climate research, and assigning human causation to individual events is even newer. There are not yet well-established protocols on how best and most robustly to compare real events with what might have happened in the absence of human-induced changes to the climate.

Following a 2003 heat wave in Western Europe, researchers from the UK’s Met Office conducted a modeling study to evaluate how much the risk of that type of extreme event had increased as a result of man-made greenhouse gas emissions. For that event, the scientists concluded with high confidence that the risk had doubled, though they cautioned that this did not mean the European heat wave was solely caused by climate change.

In light of two recent scientific studies linking greenhouse gas emissions to a higher likelihood of extreme rainfall, it appears that researchers will more commonly be investigating the potential human role in many extreme weather and climate events.  

"Climate science as we now apply it, is very much concerned with knowing what is occurring due to greenhouse gas concentrations," said meteorologist Martin Hoerling, who leads NOAA’s Climate Attribution research team and coauthored the new Russian heat wave study. Given the prediction that climate change will bring more future extreme events, Hoerling said it was natural for people to question "whether the Russian event was an early sign of this trend."

For weeks, temperatures in Moscow and throughout Western Russia were 4-5°C above seasonal averages, and as much as 2°C above the previous recorded high temperatures.

"This heat wave didn’t just break the previous records. It obliterated them," reminded Dole during a press call. “This thing was far off the charts.”

In October 2010, Climate Central conducted its own analysis of how rare the Russian event was in the context of the past 60 years, finding that the extreme temperatures Moscow saw last June, July and August “were extraordinarily intense” and the average July temperature for 2010 was warmer than any July since 1950.

  #cp_sitename{ border-right:1px solid #3D525F; color:#dadada; font-size:14px; float:left; padding:2px 10px 2px 0; margin:2px 10px 0 0; } #server-time{padding-bottom:9px} /* Float the EE link left */ div.helpLinksLeft p{color:#fff;} div.helpLinksLeft a { padding-top: 7px; display: block; float: left; }#cp_sitename{ border-right:1px solid #3D525F; color:#dadada; font-size:14px; float:left; padding:2px 10px 2px 0; margin:2px 10px 0 0; } #server-time{padding-bottom:9px} /* Float the EE link left */ div.helpLinksLeft p{color:#fff;} div.helpLinksLeft a { padding-top: 7px; display: block; float: left; }#cp_sitename{ border-right:1px solid #3D525F; color:#dadada; font-size:14px; float:left; padding:2px 10px 2px 0; margin:2px 10px 0 0; } #server-time{padding-bottom:9px} /* Float the EE link left */ div.helpLinksLeft p{color:#fff;} div.helpLinksLeft a { padding-top: 7px; display: block; float: left; }#cp_sitename{ border-right:1px solid #3D525F; color:#dadada; font-size:14px; float:left; padding:2px 10px 2px 0; margin:2px 10px 0 0; } #server-time{padding-bottom:9px} /* Float the EE link left */ div.helpLinksLeft p{color:#fff;} div.helpLinksLeft a { padding-top: 7px; display: block; float: left; }#cp_sitename{ border-right:1px solid #3D525F; color:#dadada; font-size:14px; float:left; padding:2px 10px 2px 0; margin:2px 10px 0 0; } #server-time{padding-bottom:9px} /* Float the EE link left */ div.helpLinksLeft p{color:#fff;} div.helpLinksLeft a { padding-top: 7px; display: block; float: left; }#cp_sitename{ border-right:1px solid #3D525F; color:#dadada; font-size:14px; float:left; padding:2px 10px 2px 0; margin:2px 10px 0 0; } #server-time{padding-bottom:9px} /* Float the EE link left */ div.helpLinksLeft p{color:#fff;} div.helpLinksLeft a { padding-top: 7px; display: block; float: left; }#cp_sitename{ border-right:1px solid #3D525F; color:#dadada; font-size:14px; float:left; padding:2px 10px 2px 0; margin:2px 10px 0 0; } #server-time{padding-bottom:9px} /* Float the EE link left */ div.helpLinksLeft p{color:#fff;} div.helpLinksLeft a { padding-top: 7px; display: block; float: left; } Probability of July average temperature anomalies in Moscow, Russia since 1950. This image shows that the average temperature in Moscow for July 2010 was significantly hotter than in any year since 1950. Credit: Claudia Tebaldi and Remik Ziemlinski.

While studying climate records in Western Russia that extend further back in time, however, the researchers found there was no significant warming trend in the region over the past 130 years. Though average global temperatures have been increasing since the middle of the 20th Century, and each of the past three decades have been the warmest on record globally, the 1930s were the warmest decade around Moscow.

The trend mirrors what is observed in the American Midwest, which is another region that has not seen an increase in summer temperatures despite the global trend, says Hoerling. The researchers say these results are a reminder that while on the whole the globe is warming, there are also regional differences to understand, and that some areas may be warmer or cooler than the average trend.

Even though researchers don't expect any more or less of these blocking events with climate change, the group's climate simulations found that the risk of these types of heat waves in Western Russia is increasing because the average summer temperatures in the area are predicted to begin increasing. With higher baseline summer temperatures, even smaller systems of atmospheric blocking could result in heat waves.

A map of land surface temperature anomalies over Western Russia from July 20-27, 2010 offer a unique perspective on the record breaking heat wave. Credit: NASA

Moreover, Dole says the type of blocking event that caused the Russian heat wave can actually occur regularly and has been linked to many heat waves, though none as severe this. There is also no evidence that warm temperatures, on either the regional or global scale, can cause these blocking systems to develop, he says, explaining that they don’t expect these blocking events to occur more frequently in a warming world.

"The physical basis, process, and cause and effect of blocking events are poorly understood in theory and observations and less well understood in models,” says University of Michigan meteorologist Rick Rood, who blogs about climate change at WeatherUnderground and was not involved in the new study. “It is very difficult problem, where the state-of-the-art understanding is low."

Some meteorologists, however, have noted increasingly intense atmospheric blocking patterns in recent years, and are examining whether they may be linked to the warming atmosphere. According to the Weather Channel’s Stu Ostro, warming raises the heights of atmospheric pressure surfaces, which may alter atmospheric circulation, and Ostro says that he’s noticed a long-term trend of more frequent and intense blocking systems, like those implicated in the Russian heat wave.

If there was any human contribution to the 2010 summer heat wave, Dole says it was buried by the overwhelming influence of natural climate processes. "It’s like a quiet conversation going on beside a noisy fan – you can’t hear it." But as the rising concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere affects global climate, he says the human influence will become more predominant, like a conversation getting steadily louder.

"The signal gets larger and larger, so you’ll be able to hear it."

Comments

By mememine (Detroit)
on March 10th, 2011

I hate to say it but Obama is a bought and paid for DENIER now.
Obama didn’t even mention the climate change crisis in his State of the Union Address and IPCC funding has been pulled by the Republican voted majority. Carbon markets have collapsed and world governments have walked away from the scientific warnings of unstoppable warming. So why are these scientists not marching in the streets about this crisis and why are they not at least acting like this is as planetary emergency? Shouldn’t they be on CNN and Oprha? Why is the world not treating this CO2 climate crisis like the emergency the UN says it is?
I’ve never felt comfortable telling our children that CO2 is going to cause out of control warming for them or their children so should we reconsider this whole issue of CO2 causing pollution still?  What ever climate change “was”, its over now. If you don’t know that the now former believer majority voters will not vote yes to taxing the air to save the planet, YOU are the new denier. Continues support is dividing environmental efforts and not helping anyone. It’s a lost cause now. Get ahead of the curve everyone and fight pollution and further Disco science that’s wasting more and more valuable recourses for social reforms. Population Control? Is the climate change movement sustainable for another 25 years? Of course not.

Reply to this comment

By S. Majumder (Calcutta)
on March 10th, 2011

... so, keep on poking the climate beast.

Reply to this comment

By Tenney Naumer (Carbondale, IL 62901)
on March 15th, 2011

Maybe the author of this study should have read further—the paper has serious flaws and it is not possible to make such deductions from it.  From Joseph Romm’s Climate Progress blog, yesterday:

Dr. Kevin Trenberth, head of the Climate Analysis Section for the National Center for Atmospheric Research, is one of the world leading experts on the connection between global warming and extreme weather events.  I asked him about the analysis, and he wrote me a detailed comment:

The Dole et al paper “Was there a basis for anticipating the 2010 Russian Heat Wave” is superficial and does not come close to answering the question in an appropriate manner. Many statements are not justified and are actually irresponsible. The question itself is ill posed because we never expect to predict such a specific event under any circumstances, but with climate change, the odds of certain kinds of events do change.

The paper focuses on the Russian heat wave in July 2010. But it has an extremely narrow focus and does not examine conditions elsewhere in the hemisphere. The atmospheric circulation is global and interlinked over thousands of miles. It so happens that record breaking flooding occurred in July in China and India, to be followed by record breaking flooding in Pakistan in August. Is this a coincidence? No, it is not but these events are never mentioned.

Indeed it is well established that there is a strong monsoon circulation over Eurasia in summer, and the circulation was strongly enhanced in 2010 by the presence of a developing La Niña (cold waters in the tropical central and eastern Pacific, but often high sea surface temperatures (SSTs) in the west). The SSTs were exceptionally high in the Indonesian and northern Indian Ocean regions, partly as a consequence of the previous El Niño (that lasted from May 2009 to May 2010), and partly from global warming. The high SSTs fed enhanced moisture into the monsoon, giving rise to the flooding, and helped drive a strong monsoonal circulation that had a direct downward component right over southern Russia. This is in observed data. “What goes up, must come down.”

The authors did not consider these aspects at all. The models they used perform rather poorly in the Asian monsoon and its links to the Mediterranean climate and anomalies such as blocking.

The inability to simulate rainfall and the events is probably more a commentary on the models than whether or not there are influences on the atmosphere that provoked these events. By casting a wider net, these authors too may have concluded that there were indeed highly anomalous events elsewhere, and perhaps could have accounted for the global connectivity of the atmosphere.

The events involved in this Russian heat wave included the drought in the region that certainly promoted higher than normal temperatures. The authors never show any fields of rainfall or its simulation elsewhere (in Asia). They also fail to note that northern Europe has become wetter, especially in the past 30 years and wetter conditions promote cooler conditions and lower temperatures. Had they looked at June and August, they would note an upward trend in temperature in the southern Russian region.

The question in this case is not whether a blocking anticyclone was the “cause” of the heat wave. Of course it wasn’t, it was a symptom. The question should be why was the blocking high so intense and why did it last for 6 weeks with only minor breaks? Many examples are known as to why this sort of thing happens. Natural weather varies widely, but when unusual persistence occurs it is always linked to anomalous forcing of the atmosphere, usually from anomalous SSTs. The best example is El Niño. Hence an external influence (the ocean) puts an imprint on the atmosphere that makes it favorable for anticyclones to develop, persist, and redevelop in some regions, as happened evidently over Russia.

The proximate cause then is the high SSTs south of Asia, which undoubtedly had (and still have) a global warming component. Moreover, global warming no doubt helped the drying and high temperatures, once the conditions favorable for them to occur were present.

Reply to this comment

Name (required):
Email (required):
City/State/Zip:
Enter the word "climate" in the box below:

[+] View our comment guidelines.

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment will not appear until reviewed by Climate Central staff. Thank you for your patience.