News Section
Stories from Climate Central's Science Journalists and Content Partners

Warming Temperatures Could Dry Out One Third of Planet

Warming temperatures, scientists say, can tip places into drought conditions by increasing evaporation and sapping soil of its moisture. A new study suggests up to a third of the Earth's land area could be subject to drier conditions because of warmer temperatures, not just changing precipitation patterns, by the end of the century.

The study finds that one of the agricultural heartlands of the United States, the Central Plains, could become drier, even though it may not receive less rain in the future, simply because warmer temperatures will drive evaporation to dry out the rich soils. Drier soil makes it harder to grow the food that feeds the country, which can have knock-on effects on trade and national security. And the problem isn’t limited to the U.S.: Western Europe and the fertile fields of southeast China show the same drying trend, the study, detailed in the journal Climate Dynamics, found.

The drought gripping the West, particularly California, as of March 15, 2014.
Credit: U.S. Drought Monitor

Issues of future drought, food security and its potential effects on conflict were a focus of the latest report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which examined the impacts of global warming that may come to pass if societies don’t adapt and cut their emissions of greenhouse gases.

Climate models using the so-called business-as-usual greenhouse gas emissions scenario, which assumes no effort to curb emissions, found that increased evaporation “not only intensifies drying in areas where precipitation is already reduced, it also drives areas into drought that would otherwise experience little drying or even wetting from precipitation trends alone,” the authors wrote. That would potentially push up to 30 percent of Earth’s land area into drought, compared to the 12 percent precipitation trends alone would affect.

“You can probably expect a much drier future in many areas” because of warming-fueled evaporation, said study author Ben Cook, a climate scientist with Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory and the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, both in New York.

Precipitation and drought are on opposite sides of the “water equation” -- that is, precipitation puts water into the soil and warming-influenced evaporation takes it out. These effects have been known, but Cook and his team wanted “to really figure out how important is the warming going to be for future drought,” he said.

“Everyone talks about it, and on a basic level the physics makes sense,” but the team wanted to figure out where it would play a significant role, Cook told Climate Central.

The U.S. Central Plains and southeast China showed signs of that long-term drying trend in the models, and these are “two regions where if you just naively assume that it’s just precipitation that matters,” that drought signal might not show up, Cook said. Even if rain is falling, increased evaporation can mean that “you’re still emptying that soil moisture bucket more than you’re filling it up,” and getting an overall drying trend, he said.

The drying trends shown in the models are long-term ones that would affect the underlying climate over which year-to-year variations will still cause wetter and drier years, like the one currently plaguing California.

Assessing the particular role that global warming is playing in a specific event like the ongoing drought out West is tricky and scientists can’t quickly quantify the effect, but they can say that that drought is “happening in a background climate that’s much warmer,” Cook said.

In fact, March-February temperatures in California are “alarmingly going up,” said Richard Heim, a meteorologist with the National Climatic Data Center who wasn’t involved in the study. As of February 2014, California had the warmest 12-month stretch on record (back to 1895), he said, which aggravates the drought issue.

The trend of statewide temperatures in California from March to February of the next year.

Heim said the conclusions of the study are consistent with what others have found and with his own observations. He said his reaction to it was, “yeah, wow, it confirms what I’ve been seeing over the last 25 years.”

The California drought is affecting some of the country’s other key agricultural areas, but the long-term effects of this particular drought on the future are uncertain. However, when an underlying warming trend is seen in places like the Central Plains, it can create concerns for future food security.

Future projections of precipitation changes show that the areas of North America that will receive increased precipitation, and so could become new agricultural areas, are parts of Canada where ancient glaciers stripped away many of the rich soils that they left behind in the Great Plains, Heim told Climate Central. These areas may not be as productive as those currently being ploughed, though, which could create issues with the regional and global food supply.

Such broad changes in climate affecting the food supply contributed to the collapse of past civilizations, such as the Maya, “so this can be a serious problem in terms of its impact on civilization,” Heim said.

The Department of Defense has conducted studies into the potential security risks posed by the effects of large-scale drying trends on the food supply within countries and trade in food between countries, Heim said. The IPCC report also highlights such concerns and emphasizes a need to adapt current policies to deal with such future impacts.

Overall, Cook said that their new study underscores and is consistent with the statements in the IPCC report and emphasized the extent of future drought that can still be expected, given the larger uncertainty for changes in precipitation than for those in temperature.

“We’ll see what happens in the future, but we certainly don’t expect it to get better,” Cook said.

You May Also Like
Spectacular Satellite Image: Sahara Dust Sweeps Over UK
Climate Change Impacts in Pictures: 8 Stark IPCC Images
IPCC Says Climate Change is Here, World Needs to Adapt
Fracking Boosts U.S. Oil to 10 Percent of Global Supply


By Kathy Nockels (Malott WA 98829)
on April 2nd, 2014

Food security could prove to be the line in the sand. With so many nations importing more than 40% of their annual basic food stuffs it could become a situation of the haves and have nots that will increase conflict around the world. The Russian drought comes to mind as a recent example of the knife’s edge that we are already walking as the climate continues to warm. With the lack of an International agreement to cut carbon and methane emissions it looks as if we will be learning this leason and many others I suspect the hard way.

Reply to this comment

By Sundance
on April 3rd, 2014

Is there an independent body that oversees the accuracy/validity of climate models? I would like to see to what degree they assess that models represent reality or the future reality.

Reply to this comment

By WeatherTalk.TV (stamford, ct 06901)
on April 8th, 2014

Sundance: yes, absolutely.  It’s called “peer review,” part of the process in properly published scientific studies.

Reply to this comment

By Marty
on April 8th, 2014

We should be able to agree that the world needs vast amounts of electrical power, now and in the future. In fact, we need more power than we generate now- not less. Estimates are the world needs to double the amount of electricity it produces over the next 25 years. The rest of humanity wants what first world nations already have, and the only way that happens if we can generate abundant electricity!

There are unfortunately barriers to solutions created from both ends of the political spectrum, the deniers as many call them are the more obvious of the two, but no less frustrating are the true believers in climate change who have a “renewables only” solution in mind that is utterly unrealistic.

As a realist, any future that has abundant power for all of humanity must include significant amounts of power from nuclear, renewables can only supplement, they cannot even contribute half the worlds power. It’s just that simple.
Many environmentalists in recent years have actually made that conversion, but the bulk of them are way behind the curve, and are actually part of the problem too!! The ONLY current solution that can provide the vast amount of power humanity needs is nuclear!!

Reply to this comment

By Denny Gregg (Oroville, CA, 95965)
on April 11th, 2014

Unfortunately, we as a self interested species are in for a rough ride despite the ability to calculate future prospects, and then do little to change our ways. We are going to ride out the storm in the next few hundred years and do what we do best—-adapt. Unfortunately, many will suffer, and many may have short lives. We will adapt and evolve into a more robust species—-survival of the fittest. Our brains will get larger, more sophisticated or both. But we could resort to one last effort to lower carbon levels fairly rapidly. A simple low tech method exists to lower the carbon in the atmosphere. It only requires involvement by everyone. Government and private organizations can instruct, and motivate people. Plant fast growing, drought tolerant trees everywhere. Make Arbor Day a national holiday. Give generous tax breaks to anyone who plants trees, and maintains their health for at least five years, and even more after ten years. Trees should be thoroughly established by then absorbing huge quantities of carbon dioxide. This effort has to be world wide. A tree contains an enormous quantity of carbon. If we can increase carbon in the atmosphere through our many industrial activities, then we can certainly remove it.

Reply to this comment

Name (required):
Email (required):
Enter the word "climate" in the box below:

[+] View our comment guidelines.

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment will not appear until reviewed by Climate Central staff. Thank you for your patience.