News Section
Stories from Climate Central's Science Journalists and Content Partners

Sea Level Rise to Play Bigger Role in NYC Storms: Study

Repost This

Hurricane Sandy caused upward of $60 billion in damage, including an estimated $19 billion in damage and economic losses in New York City alone. Sea level rise played a relatively minor role in contributing to these losses. However, a new study finds that that might not be the case for future storms, even those that pack less of a punch than Sandy.

The study, published Thursday in the Journal of Quaternary Science, also found that the record 13.88 foot storm tide Sandy brought to New York Harbor was driven more by the fact that the storm’s strongest winds and peak surge arrived right as an astronomical high tide was peaking as well.

Flooding of the Hoboken PATH commuter station in Hoboken, N.J., during Hurricane Sandy.
Credit: The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.

“The timing of a hurricane’s landfall with respect to high tides and the individual meteorological conditions of each storm (i.e. the storm surge) are the dominant factors in determining flood height,” said Ben Horton, one of the study’s co-authors, in an email conversation. “But the additional sea-level rise from 1788 and 1821 to Sandy in 2012 exaggerated and caused (more) flooding.”

Using marsh sediments from nearby Barnegat Bay, N.J., the researchers determined the relative sea level at The Battery at the southern tip of Manhattan rose by about 20.1 inches between a storm in 1788 and Hurricane Sandy. Of this increase, about 6 inches was due to the gradual settling of the land, which has been ongoing since the end of the last Ice Age, with the remainder being the result of global warming.

The impact of sea level rise on storm surge flooding is similar to raising the floor of a basketball court. The higher the floor, the easier it is for players to dunk the ball, so that even shorter players will be able to dunk. However, the floor hasn’t been raised that far yet.

In an interview, co-author Andrew Kemp, who now teaches at Tufts University, said the 20-inch decrease in flood height if Sandy had struck in 1788 is a “pretty small number compared to how big a storm tide can be.”

But as oceans rise, more storms will be able to clear that bar with less help from tides. New York and other coastal cities will see more extensive flooding from weaker storms, while stronger storms will more easily set storm tide records.

A figure showing the estimated contributions to flood heights in New York City for notable hurricanes. 
Click image to enlarge. Credit: Kemp and Horton, J. Quaternary Science, 2013.

In June, a New York City climate panel reported that sea levels could rise at a faster rate than was forecast just a few years ago. New York Harbor could see up to 11 inches of sea level rise by the 2020s, and up to or more than 2.5 feet of sea level rise by the 2050s.

“When it does happen . . . you’re going to need smaller and smaller storms to overtop those thresholds as you go forward in time,” Kemp said. According to revised flood maps from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, hundreds of thousands more New Yorkers have been placed in the 100-year floodplain compared to the maps that existed when Hurricane Sandy struck. With sea level rise, the city expects that up to one-quarter of all New York City’s land area, with 800,000 residents, will be in the floodplain.

“If we do nothing, more than 40 miles of our waterfront could see flooding on a regular basis, just during normal high tide,” New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg said while rolling out the city’s post-Sandy climate resilience plan in June.

“We can think of these things as tipping points and sea level rise will cause them to be exceeded more often in the future because the baseline for hurricanes is raised and storms with smaller surges and not necessarily arriving on the highest tides will be able to overtop those physical structures,” Horton said.

Related Content
Surging Seas: Sea Level Rise Analysis By Climate Central
New York Launches $19.5 Billion Climate Resiliency Plan
Heeding Sandy's Lessons, Before the Next Big Storm
Warming May Bring More 'Black Swan' Storm Surges
Hurricane Isaac Spurs Design of Storm Surge Warnings
Warming Has Doubled Risk of Katrina-Like Storm Surges

Comments

By Eric Peterson (Front Royal, VA 22630)
on August 12th, 2013

“New York Harbor could see up to 11 inches of sea level rise by the 2020s”

Sea level is rising one inch per decade and not accelerating.

Reply to this comment

By Dave (Basking Ridge, NJ 07920)
on August 12th, 2013

@CC: I think a tutorial or technically informed blog post on the topic of sea level rise data and measurement may be in order at some point here if someone over there on the science team feels willing and able.

If I may, I think that such a post could usefully outline and explain the difference and relative strengths and merits between the two core measurement techniques of traditional tide gauges and the more modern satellite radar altimetry as referred to different measured sea level quantities such as sea level relative to adjacent land masses (important for focused coastal information) and global sea level relative to a geopotential surface or other reference and so on, (more useful for evaluating net global climate change effects), with some description of the kinds of corrections and processing that goes on in order to obtain those data and why and the kind of physical factors that influence sea level both locally along coastlines and globally out to sea as well – both important but for different reasons. Then maybe when sea level rise is under discussion in a report described here with respect to say NY there could be some reasonable explanation available at this site for why that can be a different and yet valid number (within that specific measurement uncertainty range) or rate of rise for say NY versus that same quantity for some other coastal city and why perhaps those two and perhaps equally valid numbers are also likely to be different from the reported global mean which instead corresponds to what is happening to the entire sea surface reflecting changes to the entire ocean volume and so on.

Just a suggestion…

Reply to this comment

Name (required):
Email (required):
City/State/Zip:
Enter the word "climate" in the box below:

[+] View our comment guidelines.

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment will not appear until reviewed by Climate Central staff. Thank you for your patience.