News Section
Stories from Climate Central's Science Journalists and Content Partners

In Wake of Sea Ice Loss, Focus on New Models, Melt Ponds

Since Arctic sea ice extent plummeted to a record low in September, shattering the previous record set in 2007, much has been made of the fact that sea ice has declined at a much faster pace than what most scientists had anticipated. Until recently, most computer models failed to capture the precipitous decline in Arctic sea ice that has occurred since satellite observations began in 1979.

This image compares the sea ice extent minimum on Sept. 16 (in white) to the average minimum during the past 30 years (yellow line).
Click on the image for a larger version. Credit: NASA.

In order to make improved projections, scientists are fine-tuning their understanding of the many influences on sea ice trends, including both manmade global warming and natural climate variability. The emerging science points to a complex interplay between manmade global warming, natural climate variability, and sea ice dynamics that scientists are only just beginning to truly understand.

For example, one new study shows that the melt ponds that form on top of sea ice floes in June and July can dramatically accelerate sea ice melt. These ponds, which form as snow and ice melt under the Arctic sun, can dramatically increase the amount of solar radiation the ice absorbs. This warms the surface and eventually allows more heat to  ocean waters below, in effect melting sea ice from the top and bottom.

The study found that the melt rate beneath pond-covered ice is up to three times greater than that of bare ice.

“In a crude sense, pond-covered ice is more akin to open water. So, because ponded ice reflects less of the solar radiation, there is more heat available to melt the surface of the ice,” said Daniel Feltham, a researcher at the Center for Polar Observation and Modeling at the University College London, and co-author of the study, in an email.

The study, published in the Journal of Geophysical Research, showed that computer models incorporating melt pond information tend to perform better in simulating historical conditions than models that don’t take such ponds into account.

The study also points to an unexpected relationship between snow cover and sea ice loss. The more snow on top of the ice at the beginning of the sea ice melt season, the greater potential there is for melt ponds to form, and thereby speed up sea ice loss, the study found.

Researchers drill into a melt pond on Arctic sea ice during the 2012 melt season.
Credit: Julienne Stroeve/NSIDC.

“More snow means more snowmelt in [the] spring, resulting in larger melt ponds at that time,” which lowers the reflectivity of the sea ice, Feltham said. “As a result of this, the net effect of more snow may actually be more melt, rather than less.”

Julienne Stroeve, a research scientist at the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) in Boulder, Colo., said that during a recent trip to the Arctic she noticed that sea ice floes that were covered with melt ponds tended to be one and a half feet thinner than ones without them.

Are Model Trends Catching Up to the Real World?

Newer computer models that scientists are using to help prepare the next IPCC report, which is scheduled to be released in 2014, do a much better job capturing the historical sea ice trends than the previous generation of models did, several sea ice experts told Climate Central.

“... The argument that the ice loss is outpacing model projections no longer seems to be true,” said Marika Holland, a researcher at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, in an email conversation.

Recent studies have also zeroed in on the relative contribution of manmade global warming to sea ice loss compared to natural climate factors. The research has shown that manmade global warming is likely responsible for 50 to 60 percent of Arctic sea ice decline during the satellite era. Mark Serreze, the director of the NSIDC, said that making a clear separation between manmade and natural factors is “very difficult,” since as the sea ice thins, it become more vulnerable to melting spurred by weather patterns.

This occurred in 2007, when prevailing winds flushed sea ice out of the Arctic Ocean through the Fram Strait, leaving it to melt in the iceberg graveyard that is the North Atlantic Ocean.

Accelerated melting due to weather factors may also have occurred during the past melt season, when a massive Arctic storm swept across the Arctic Ocean in August. This may have helped break up ice floes and encourage melting, although no formal studies of this event have yet been completed.

One projection that the newer models have not honed in on, however, is the approximate date when the Arctic Ocean will be seasonally ice free during the summer months. This is a subject of intense media speculation, and is of special interest to oil and gas companies eager to explore the Arctic Ocean for natural resources, as well as for shipping companies hoping to take advantage of new and shorter trade routes.

Stroeve said that sea ice volume, which incorporates measurements of ice extent as well as thickness, is a more important metric than sea ice extent alone. Ice extent, she said, will exhibit considerable variability even after the arrival of ice-free summers, whereas ice volume trends would be more consistent. “Because you could have an anomalously cold summer that allows a thin layer of ice to remain and increase the extent. In our climate model simulations we don’t see evidence of a tipping point, so it appears that even though the Arctic may become ice-free, the ice could also recover for a few years.”

Projections of when the Arctic will be, in effect, ice-free in summer (some sea ice is expected to linger in spots, such as north of Greenland and the Canadian Archipelago) still range from sometime during the next decade to as late as the end of this century. In general, the newer projections show the Arctic becoming seasonally ice free earlier than previous forecasts did.

Related Content
As Sea Ice Fades, the Arctic Becomes a Nautical Highway
It's Official, Arctic Sea Ice Shatters Record Low
Forget the Melting Arctic, Sea Ice in Antarctica is Growing!
"Astonishing" Ice Melt May Lead to More Extreme Winters
A Closer Look at Arctic Ice Melt and Extreme Weather

Comments

By jnffarrell1 (jacksonville/FL/32258)
on October 3rd, 2012

Welcome to real world modeling. Continuum physics has always had problems with modeling heterogeneous materials, such as found by earth scientists. Eventually the most important material properties are incorporated in the most important zones and computations. Then and only then do physical predictions start to match the real world.

Adding politicians and PR into the science does nothing to advance science.

Reply to this comment

By Dave (Basking Ridge, NJ 07920)
on October 3rd, 2012

“The study found that the melt rate beneath pond-covered ice is up to three times greater than that of bare ice.”

I don’t wish to lower the standards of comment here - but at the risk of that here’s a thought: The Arctic melt pond water is probably really good fresh water and there is probably a huge amount of it up there in the late summer these days..  So, if it could be carefully siphoned off leaving the ice below intact and then transported it could be used to help regions elsewhere in desperate need of fresh water while also helping to conserve what sea ice remains to the benefit of reduced warming.  I wonder what the economics of that would look like. smile

Reply to this comment

By Bob
on October 3rd, 2012

NASA predicts that solar cycle 24 will peak in early or mid 2013 with about 59 sunspots. This would make it the least active cycle in the past one hundred years.  The International Space Environment Service predicts the cycle to peak at 90 sunspots in May 2013 (which would make cycle 24 the least active, since the one peaking, in 1928). -says Wikipedia.

Of course, solar cycle 25 will peak, in 2024.  GHGs will be even more off the hook, so the greenhouse effect and TSI are likely to combine, to really make the Arctic cap ice fail, as much as possible.

If carbon recycling doesn’t happen, so CO2 from power plants does NOT go into algae and methanol production, right near O2-fired gas plants or scrubbed Fischer-Tropsch plants, CO2 and the other GHGs will simply accelerate, past any conservation effort, and radical re-greening must be attempted, at all deserts or polluted areas, or MASS EXTINCTION EVENT 6 will get really nasty.

All the fresh water in the system means more rain, somewhere, which falls as pH 5.5 or worse.  The meltwater is at best pH 7, which plays heck, with the oceans, now at pH 8.1, formerly at pH 8.2, but occasionally at pH 7.7, at cold upwellings, which kill oysters and other shellfish, eggs, little fish, corals, and plankton.

A couple of really bad food web years combined, with more over-fishing, and jellyfish could take over, as top ocean predator.  Tuna?  Cod?  Herring?  Whales?  Kiss a fish or another marine animal GOODBYE, since they are about to get cleaned out. 

Got a drug or other war, with a big carbon footprint?  Sure we have!  And the reason we don’t get to have HEMP is it was going to be the number one cash crop in the world, to make 25,000 market leading products, including biofuels, but FDR and Congress sold out a Hemp Stamp Tax Act of 1938, to Andrew Mellon, W.R. Hearst, and their timber and fossil fuel interests.  That is why hemp is a Schedule I CS, but crack, smack, crank, and George Zimmerman’s Adderall are Schedule II Controlled Substances.

But, if Uncle Tom Obamney keeps killing with drones, he doesn’t have time to bust GW for starting two wars (http://www.heartson.com/Politics) OR to properly prioritize climate change. 

Reply to this comment

By john harkness
on October 4th, 2012

I would think snow would also insulate the ice during the winter, keeping it from getting thicker. So then in the spring, not only do you have more meltponds, but they are sitting on thinner ice that will melt faster.

It is weird and surprising to me that melt from below is so much faster in pond-covered ice.

But really, at this point, it’s all moot. The ice cap is gone. There is no more vast expanse of multi-meter, multi-year ice that characterized the Arctic for millions of years.

Measures of extent are, in this case, rather misleading.

Reply to this comment

By Lloyd Smith (62234)
on October 21st, 2012

The ECMWF is forecasting an Arctic Dipole for October 23-?.  More of the remaining MYI to be flushed out the Fram?

Reply to this comment

Name (required):
Email (required):
City/State/Zip:
Enter the word "climate" in the box below:

[+] View our comment guidelines.

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment will not appear until reviewed by Climate Central staff. Thank you for your patience.