News Section
Stories from Climate Central's Science Journalists and Content Partners

Electricity Generated Using Solar Mirrors to Double in 2013

Repost This

Electricity produced from reflected sunlight using large arrays of mirrors constructed in the desert Southwest is expected to more than double this year, thanks to several large solar thermal power plants that are scheduled to begin operating soon in Arizona and California, the U.S. Energy Information Administration announced in a report Thursday.

The two biggest solar thermal power plants that will be operating by the end of the year could power more than 200,000 homes in the Southwest. 

Solar energy, produced from both photovoltaic and solar thermal, particularly on public lands in the West, is part of the Obama administration’s Climate Action Plan, which calls for more solar power plants to be permitted on public lands as a way to generate clean energy, combatting climate change. The plan, which was released in June, touts 25 utility-scale solar plants that the administration has permitted on public lands since 2009.

Ivanpah solar thermal electric power generating plant in California. Credit: U.S. Dept. of Energy

Solar thermal power plants use arrays of mirrors to focus sunlight on water or another fluid, heating the liquid and turning a turbine, generating electricity. They do not use photovoltaic cells common with rooftop solar generating installations and other larger solar power plants.

The EIA projects that the solar thermal generating stations expected to come online this year, each funded by U.S. Department of Energy loans, will generate about 641 megawatts of electricity, which will add to the current 476 megawatts of solar-thermal capacity in the U.S. prior to the new plants starting operations. Later this year and in 2014, a total of six new solar thermal projects are expected to begin operating, generating a total of 1,257 megawatts of new power generating capacity. Those projects will represent 4 percent of all new additions to U.S. electric generating capacity for 2013 and 2014, according to EIA data.

The two largest solar thermal power plants beginning operation this year are Abengoa Solar’s 250-megawatt Solana power plant in Gila Bend, Ariz., and BrightSource Energy’s 392-megawatt Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System in California’s Mojave Desert. Both plants are larger than any other solar thermal generating station ever built in the U.S.

“They’re a new breed,” said EIA solar power analyst Gwen Bredehoeft. “There’s going to be a lot of interest in watching how they perform.”

Until the technology and economics of solar thermal are proven, little growth in capacity is expected after 2016, she said.

Solar thermal power plants are expensive — costing up to $2.2 billion each — and some developers have canceled their solar-thermal projects in favor of photovoltaic power generators, which are seen to be less expensive to build and operate since photovoltaic costs have dropped in recent years, she said.

Photovoltaic — built with solar panels — and solar thermal are two distinct technologies, Bredehoeft said.

Solana, which began operating in October, collects sunlight using “parabolic mirrored troughs,” which track the movement of the sun and focus the reflected sunlight onto a tube filled with heat transfer fluid-filled that runs through the center of the trough, according to the EIA. The plant also includes thermal storage, which the EIA says will allow the plant to generate electricity for six hours using only stored energy. The plant is expected to generate enough electricity to provide power to 70,000 homes.

The Ivanpah plant, located on public Bureau of Land Management land 50 miles northwest of Needles, Calif., uses a giant array of mirrors positioned in a large circle around three “power towers.” The mirrors focus sunlight on a boiler at the top of a 459-foot tower in the center of the circle, generating steam and turning an electric turbine, the EIA report says. The plant is expected to generate enough electricity to power 140,000 homes in California.

Federal loan guarantees totaled $1.45 billion for the Solana project and $1.6 billion for Ivanpah, according to the EIA.

Related Content

A Solar Power First
A Post-Solyndra Snapshot of Solar Energy in America
Public Lands Ripe for Renewable Energy Development, Report Says
Sun 'Must Supply 10 Percent of Energy by 2025'

Comments

By Eric Peterson (Front Royal, VA 22630)
on November 16th, 2013

“Solar thermal power plants are expensive — costing up to $2.2 billion each”

The article hints at capacity factor with “The plant is expected to generate enough electricity to power 140,000 homes in California”  The average home uses about 1000 kWh per month which means 1.4 kW on a continuous basis.  Multiply that by the 140,000 homes and we get about a 200kW power plant for $2 billion or $10k per kW.

The EIA says $6k per kW, see http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/capitalcost/xls/table1.xls which is probably optimistic,  That same table says $676 per kW for some types of natural gas plants.  Coal is expensive in that table mostly due to carbon capture and other new requirements.  Traditionally coal is about 4 cents per kWh and this solar thermal starts at 19 cents.  This is a waste of my taxpayer dollars and will also force ratepayers to pay subsidies for the life of the plant.

Why is that when sunlight is free?  Look at the same table from the EIA.  The ongoing costs are more than double those of solar photovoltaic.  Unlike photovoltaic, this type of primitive mirror and boiler system can never be expected to improve and come down in costs.  The reason is simple: the mirrors require 1000’s of motors which will need constant maintenance and replacement.

Reply to this comment

Name (required):
Email (required):
City/State/Zip:
Enter the word "climate" in the box below:

[+] View our comment guidelines.

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment will not appear until reviewed by Climate Central staff. Thank you for your patience.