News Section
Stories from Climate Central's Science Journalists and Content Partners

Drilling, Fracking Efficiency Fuels Oil and Gas Boom

Technological advances in drilling efficiency are one of the reasons shale oil and natural gas production continues to skyrocket in six of America’s biggest oil and natural gas fields, according to a new U.S. Energy Information Administration report.

Production of crude oil and natural gas through the use of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, is considered to have a significant effect on climate change because of methane leaks in the natural gas distribution system that haven’t been quantified yet. And, burning crude oil is a direct emitter of greenhouse gases contributing to human-caused climate change.

A drilling rig in the Bakken shale oil play in eastern Montana.
Credit: Montana Board of Oil and Gas

The EIA reports that more oil and gas is being produced more efficiently now than even a year ago in natural gas fields in the Marcellus shale of Pennsylvania and the Haynesville shale of Texas and Louisiana. That’s also true in the crude oil fields of the Eagle Ford and Permian basins of Texas, the Niobrara shale of Colorado and Wyoming and the Bakken shale of North Dakota and Montana.

In Nov. 2012, about 300 barrels of crude oil per day were being produced for each active drilling rig in the Bakken shale of western North Dakota. Today, crude oil production per rig has increased to 500 barrels per day. In Pennsylvania’s Marcellus shale, roughly 5 million cubic feet of natural gas were being produced per rig per day, a figure that has jumped to about 6.5 million cubic feet today.

In each of the six major oil and gas fields across the country, overall production has increased dramatically over just a year ago. Crude oil production in the Eagle Ford shale, for example, has increased to more than 1.3 million barrels per day today, up from about 800,000 barrels of oil per day at the beginning of 2013. Natural gas production has seen increases nearly everywhere except in east Texas and Louisiana, where production has begun to decline, EIA data show.

By next month, each Eagle Ford drilling rig is expected to contribute over 400 barrels of oil per day more than it would have drilling in the same area seven years ago. In the Marcellus, natural gas wells drilled today can be expected to produce more than 6 million cubic feet of gas per day than a newly drilled well would have in 2007, according to the EIA.

More precise drilling technology means that energy companies can drill more wells per rig and drill into higher-yielding pockets of oil and gas, EIA industrial economist Mike Ford said.

“I would say that the utilization of mobile drilling pads has played a major role in increasing the number of wells that can be drilled per rig,” he said.

Mobile drilling pads have long been used in shale oil and natural gas fields. For example, when natural gas drilling was booming in western Colorado’s Piceance Basin more than seven years ago, a movable drilling platform could drill perhaps dozens of wells right next to each other on the same drilling site. The wells themselves would angle in different directions deep underground from the land surface using a technique called “directional” drilling.

“Essentially, mobile drilling pads allow operators to move rigs between different well sites in the same location so that groups of wells can be drilled without having to disassemble a drilling platform,” Ford said. “This reduces the amount of time that it takes to drill individual wells.”

Credit: U.S. Energy Information Administration

Energy companies have been focusing on drilling “sweet spot” areas in oil and gas fields — areas where a greater concentration of oil and gas can be found and extracted, he said.

Drilling techniques have been refined to maximize the oil and gas bearing area that each well can access, and drillers are likely to have used fracking to increase the amount of oil and gas they can extract and bring to market, Ford said.

As the EIA expects natural gas production in the U.S. to increase 56 percent through 2040, what greater oil and gas drilling efficiency means for the climate is an open question, however.

Scientists have long complained that there are too little data available to accurately assess energy production’s impact on groundwater, air quality and the climate, and access to oil and gas drilling and production sites is often too restricted for scientists to adequately study them, a group of scientists said during a presentation at the American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting in San Francisco last December.

A Stanford University-led study released in February showed that methane leaks are common in natural gas production and distribution. However, those leaks may not fully negate the climate benefits of using natural gas to produce electricity.

Methane is a greenhouse gas about 100 times as potent as carbon dioxide soon after being released into the atmosphere, and about 34 times as potent as CO2 after about 100 years in the atmosphere.

Fracking alone could emit up to 1 teragram of methane per year in the U.S. — only a fraction of possible overall natural gas methane emissions, the study’s co-author Francis O’Sullivan said when it was published last month.

You May Also Like
The Best View You’ll See of the Spring Equinox
A Cold U.S. Winter for Sure, but 8th Warmest Globally
White House Brings Together Big Data & Climate Change
Wood Burning for Home Heating Trendy in Northeast


By iag
on March 23rd, 2014

The new tech that is spurring shale oil drilling is $100 a barrel. If oil was still at $20(or even $50) a barrel, there would be no fracking to get the shale.

Reply to this comment

By Sue Spencer (NY)
on March 24th, 2014

Even if the fracking process released absolutely no methane into the atmosphere and was amazingly “efficient” it would NOT be a viable, sane means to source energy.  Not as long as BILLIONS of gallons of irreplaceable fresh water per month and ground water supplies continue to be CONTAMINATED with chemicals so vile the industry refuses to disclose them!

Please!  How about a Climate Central article which focuses on this fact (and the resultant earthquakes!)

We may as well inject ourselves with poison to receive energy - Fracking is lunacy

Reply to this comment

By Michael Berndtson (Berwyn, IL )
on March 24th, 2014

What about all that flared gas in liquids rich shale fields up there in North Dakota? Or Texas? Or the Utica in Ohio? The knocked out liquids have immediate value so gas just gets burned. Gases are a pain to collect and transmit - or don’t when capital needs to be spent. Plus putting all that gas onto the market would sink the price and ruin it for drillers in Pennsylvania and elsewhere in gas rich fields. We’re talking something like a spot price of $1.5 to $2.0 million per day is flared at the Bakken fields alone. Flaring efficiency ranges somewhere between 60 to 99 percent. The lower end of the range is when larger hydrocarbons like C2 through C6 are part of the mix or nobody in an oversight role is taking measurements or even cares.

Assuming every problem needs a solution. Statoil of Norway is big in US shale oil and gas. Specifically in the Bakken. Norway has like a three quarters of a trillion rainy day fund (or whatever you call a sovereign nation trust). Have them put gas collection on all the Bakken wells and build a pipeline from North Dakota to Europe. Float it or bury it under the Atlantic Ocean - it’s their call. And no. Public relations pushes saying that fracking is going green is not the same as actually implementing gas collection and transmission.

Reply to this comment

Name (required):
Email (required):
Enter the word "climate" in the box below:

[+] View our comment guidelines.

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment will not appear until reviewed by Climate Central staff. Thank you for your patience.