News Section
Stories from Climate Central's Science Journalists and Content Partners

Using CO2 Emissions to Pump Oil May Help the Climate

Carbon capture and storage is often talked about as a way to keep major polluters’ carbon dioxide emissions out of the atmosphere by tucking them away safely underground forever.

But carbon capture and storage, or CCS, could be used more often in a rather counterintuitive way: To produce crude oil, which releases its own CO2 emissions when it’s burned, helping drive climate change.

An oil field in California's Central Valley.
Credit:  Richard Masoner/flickr

Here’s the twist: Experts say producing more oil using CO2 captured from coal-fired power plants may actually reduce the total amount of CO2 released into the atmosphere from burning coal and crude oil.

Called “carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery,” the process works like this: CO2 emissions are captured from coal-fired power plants, then transported to old oil fields where production peaked long ago. By injecting the captured CO2 into existing oil wells that have been producing diminishing amounts of crude oil, hard-to-get crude oil will react with the CO2 and swell deep underground. The oil becomes thinner, allowing it to flow more freely into an old oil well and reviving production in an old oil field.

As counterintuitive as it may seem, that may be good news for the climate because total emissions from burning both the coal and the crude oil may be reduced, some experts say.

Injecting CO2 from a coal-fired power plant into an oil well sequesters the plant’s emissions underground, partially offsetting the CO2 emitted from burning the oil, said Patrick Falwell, a fellow with C2ES, or the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, formerly the Pew Center on Global Climate Change.

“The hope is that the CO2 you’ve injected will exceed or equal the CO2 that results from the combustion of the oil,” Falwell said. “In terms of the greater market for oil, if the oil produced by EOR (enhanced oil recovery) actually displaces oil from another source that didn’t involve injecting man-made CO2 underground, you’re doing better from a market perspective.”

Falwell said scientists are confident that the CO2 stored underground in oil wells will remain there permanently and is unlikely to eventually leak into the atmosphere, a claim backed by several studies. One of those, a 2008 University of Texas study, shows that over 37 years of CO2 injection, leakage was rare.

Today, enhanced oil recovery with CO2 injection accounts for about 300,000 barrels of oil production per day, or about 5 percent of total U.S. crude oil production, mainly in fields in Texas, he said.

As crude oil prices rise, more and more crude oil in the U.S. will be produced using CO2 injection, a U.S. Energy Information Administration report released Wednesday shows. Depending on how much crude oil prices increase, between 8 and 12 percent of all crude oil produced in the U.S. in 2040 could be extracting using captured CO2.

A study by Stephen Melzer, a consultant for the National Enhanced Oil Recovery Initiative, says that injecting CO2 for crude oil production can help reduce emissions by turning industrial and power plant CO2 emissions into a valuable commodity, helping to accelerate storage of climate change-driving emissions.

Today, many oil and gas operations use CO2 from natural underground sources produced specifically for oil fields, resulting in no climate benefit. But that’s changing as captured CO2 emissions become a commodity, said Mark Northam, director of the School of Energy Resources at the University of Wyoming.

“As CO2 emissions regulations grow, more CO2 will become available,” he said. “EOR is currently the only revenue-generating use for a growing CO2 supply. There are hundreds of mature oil fields around the U.S. that are suitable for EOR, so the logic says project numbers will grow.”

An oil and gas field near homes in Colorado.
Credit: Bobby Magill

Some studies paint a more skeptical picture of the role of CO2 emissions injection into oil fields as a way to mitigate climate change.

James Dooley, a carbon capture and storage expert and engineer at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory’s Joint Global Change Research Institute, published a 2010 study showing that oil field CO2 emissions injection may do little more for the climate than spark interest in new CCS technology.

Of the 129 CO2 injection projects in oil fields worldwide in 2010, only one of them was a certified carbon capture and storage project. That, and other weak interest in the technology in oil fields shows that oil field CO2 emissions injection “is not a mandatory step on the path to CCS deployment,” Dooley wrote in the study.

Dooley could not be reached for comment.

Groups interested in the prospect that oil production using captured CO2 emissions could have a climate benefit are working with Congress to create a tax incentive for it.

C2ES, a co-convener of the National Enhanced Oil Recovery Initiative, is working with Congress to pass a bill that would include CO2 injection for crude oil production as part of an existing carbon sequestration tax credit.

Members of the initiative include representatives of environmental groups such as the Natural Resources Defense Council, agricultural producers including Archer Daniels Midland, and state government agencies in New Mexico and Michigan, among other organizations.

You May Also Like
Late July Chill Helps Set Record Lows Across the East 
Driven by Ocean Heat, World Sets Mark for Hottest June
Warming Threatens Roads, Ports and Planes, Report Says 
Shifting Cities: 1,001 Blistering Future Summers


By Thomas Radecki (Clarion, PA 16214)
on August 1st, 2014

It is insanity to talk about 10% of U.S. oil extracted in 2040.  This is just the fossil fuel industry wanting to get more financial subsidies.  We need to go fossil fuel free and leave it all in the ground.  2040 is too late.  Many scientists agree that we have already passed the 2C limit on catastrophic results and that it is only a matter of time before the consequences of our destructive habits become reality.  Solar and wind are already very economical.  Germany has shown that there is no problem getting more than 50% of electricity from them and even 100% has already been attained for brief periods of time.

Coal, oil, and natural gas are killers and need to be left in the ground.  We all need to go carbon neutral as quickly as humanly possible, even if it does mean temporary sacrifices for a decade or two.  Global warming is going to kill billions of humans later this century and still more after that, primarily due to starvation.  The carbon bullets shooting out of power plants and tailpipes today will keep killing for hundreds of years.

Reply to this comment

By Tim Carr (MORGANTOWN/WV/26505)
on August 2nd, 2014

So Germany the penultimate in renewables saw CO2 from energy in 2013 rise 1.5% from 2012 according to German government calculations.  It will probably be even higher in 2014.  The highest electric power costs in the world (35cents/kwh) and increased CO2 emissions.  Running coal plants as peakers to renewables is less than optimum.  A great combination brought on by government mandated use/misuse of renewables.

Reply to this comment

By abo123 (seattle/wa/98115)
on August 1st, 2014

“One of those, a 2008 University of Texas study, shows that over 37 years of CO2 injection, leakage was rare.”

This non-peered reviewed report does no such thing. It only assesses the risks of blowout associated with CO2 injection in brine. In fact, recent monitoring of abandoned wells shows abundant leakage of methane, which questions the quantity of CO2 that would remain trapped.

Reply to this comment

By Mark Bigland-Pritchard (Saskatoon SK S7H 1G9)
on August 2nd, 2014

Rough calculations using predictions for the maybe-nearly-complete Boundary Dam 3 CCS refit in Saskatchewan, and the existing Weyburn-Midale EOR scheme, indicate that the CO2 emitted from burning the extra oil produced will be between 2 and 3 time the amount of CO2 sequestered.

Rough calclulations also show that closing down Boundary Dam 3 and generating the equivalent amount of power from wind turbines could work out at least 30% cheaper even before the cost of the coal is taken into account.  And going with coal+CCS means that, per MWh output, about 10% of the carbon is still emitted.  With wind it is zero.

It is difficult to avoid the conclusion that CCS, as currently envisaged, is a boondoggle to give a little extra life to the coal and oil industries - industries which need to be phased out rapidly if we are to avoid irreversible climate change.

Reply to this comment

Name (required):
Email (required):
Enter the word "climate" in the box below:

[+] View our comment guidelines.

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment will not appear until reviewed by Climate Central staff. Thank you for your patience.