News Section
Stories from Climate Central's Science Journalists and Content Partners

How Climate Friendly is Bike Sharing? It’s Complicated

In Oklahoma, where modern bike sharing began, they’re called Tulsa Townies. In New York, they’re CitiBikes. In Denver, bike sharing is called B-Cycle. In Washington, D.C., the program is Capital Bikeshare.

These brightly colored bikes and their riders, often seen braving a gauntlet of impatient taxis, city buses and delivery trucks in dense urban areas, are nearly ubiquitous in these cities, granting commuters the freedom to leave their cars behind and get to their destination on their own schedule without having to walk far or take a bus or train.

Denver B-Cycle bikes at a docking station.
Credit: Jeremy Crantek/flickr

Though bike sharing in other forms has been around for decades, automated electronic bike sharing systems are a recent invention, and they're spreading quickly through the country's biggest cities. New York's CitiBike program, which began in May 2013, counted 8.7 million riders in its first year.  

Several things are nearly certain about these modern bike-sharing programs and the more than 25 others across the country: Since 2007 when the United States' first program using automated bike rental stations began in Tulsa, nobody has ever died on a bike-share bike, a statistical oddity to be sure.

And, as more than 23 million trips on these bikes have been taken in that time, all of that pedaling has been great for the climate because each mile someone rides on a bike-share bike instead of driving a car means about 1 pound of carbon dioxide is kept out of the atmosphere, said Susan Shaheen, co-director of the Transportation Sustainability Research Center at the University of California-Berkeley.

But how many people have traded their car for a bike-share bike? That’s where the certainty ends about how bike-sharing programs benefit the climate.

“As of now, for a number of reasons, we have not made estimations on specifically how much CO2 bike sharing keeps out of the atmosphere for any given program,” she said.

Estimating how bike sharing keeps CO2 out of the atmosphere is complicated because every bike-sharing program works differently and collects data differently, Shaheen said. Each system also has residual benefits that could reduce CO2 emissions that may not be factored into calculating bike-sharing’s carbon footprint.

For example, bike sharing could lead to more people using public transit, and then possibly renting a bike to get to work, instead of driving a car for the entire trip, she said.

Nobody knows for sure how many people have decided to rent a bike-share bike instead of driving a car, and there’s no industry standard for how to measure the CO2 emissions that have been avoided by people taking trips on one of those bikes. 

Many people using bike-share programs in denser cities are only avoiding public transit rather than avoiding driving a car, muting the CO2 benefits of bike-share programs. Conversely, in less dense cities, bike sharing is used as a way to connect people to public transit, which would enhance the climate benefit, Shaheen said.

A 2012 University of British Columbia study focusing on the climate benefits of bike sharing in Vancouver says numerous factors play into how effective a bike-share system is at reducing emissions. Those include the size of the area the program serves, regional weather, and helmet-wearing requirements.

A man riding a CitiBike down Lafayette St. in New York City in August. Credit: Bobby Magill

So in Vancouver, where it rains often and riders are required to wear helmets, fewer people may want to rent a bike on a regular basis. But in New York City, where it’s sunnier and where helmets aren’t required for adults, a greater percentage of people may be interested in renting a CitiBike.

In other words, every city is different.

The University of British Columbia study concluded that the climate benefit of bike sharing in Vancouver — Canada’s most densely populated city — was so small that the system would be better marketed as a way for people to get more exercise than reduce CO2 emissions.

“It’s difficult to estimate this number,” said Ralph Buehler, an assistant professor of urban affairs at Virginia Tech and co-author of “City Cycling,” a book published by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press on urban cycling and bike-share programs.

Not every system collects CO2 emissions data, but so far researchers have found that for nearly all bike-share systems, the switch from cars to bikes is less than 20 percent, Buehler said.

Bike-share systems that estimate how many CO2 emissions or car trips they’ve helped to prevent report larger numbers.

Data from Nice Ride Minnesota, the bike-sharing program in Minneapolis and St. Paul, show that in 2011, about 53 percent of the program’s riders use a car less often as a result of using the program. That trend for the program will be shown to have continued in 2013 when a new Mineta Transportation Institute report on bike sharing is published soon, Shaheen said

New York City's CitiBike program amassed 8.75 million trips covering 14.7 million miles in its first year. The program began in May 2013.
Credit: Bobby Magill

In Denver, 41 percent of Denver B-Cycle bike trips replaced car trips, and the entire program is estimated to have avoided more than 1 million pounds of CO2 emissions, said Nick Bohnenkamp, executive director of Denver Bike Sharing, which owns and operates Denver B-Cycle.

B-Cycle, the company that designs the bike-sharing systems used in Denver and more than 20 other cities across the country, says that on all of its systems combined, 2.1 million bike trips covering 4.5 million miles have been made on its bicycles since 2010, all of which have offset more than 2,948 metric tons of CO2 emissions and saved more than 330,000 gallons of gasoline, B-Cycle spokeswoman Marina Marich said.

Those offset CO2 emissions represent a tiny fraction of the total emissions from many major cities. Los Angeles, for example, emitted 50.3 million metric tons of CO2 in 2007.

Bohnenkamp said there is interest among bike-share program officials to start a trade association that would standardize how data is collected and how each bike-share system’s climate and other benefits are estimated and reported.

Perhaps the biggest way bike sharing helps the climate is that it’s a “gateway drug” to all forms of cycling, Buehler said.

The more people there are cycling on city streets, the more support there is for bike lanes and other cycling infrastructure, he said.

And that means more people want to get on bikes and get out of their carbon-emitting cars.

“They’ve made cycling the cool thing to do,” Buehler said. “Bike share itself is a big advertisement for cycling.”

You May Also Like
What Climate Change in the Rockies Means for its Water  
California Has Hottest Start to Year While Midwest Chills 
87 Cities, 4 Scenarios and 1 Really Hot Future 
Keystone XL Will Spike Oil Demand and CO2, Study Says

Comments

By John S. (New York, NY)
on August 18th, 2014

“Since 2007 when the first program began in Tulsa, nobody has ever died on a bike-share bike, a statistical oddity to be sure.”

Not true.  A woman was killed on a Montreal Bixi bike: http://globalnews.ca/news/1295401/woman-killed-while-cycling-under-viaduct-on-st-denis/

Reply to this comment

By Ivan
on August 18th, 2014

There have also been bikeshare deaths in France, and probably in other countries too, but the paragraph containing this statement clearly was about the United States.

Reply to this comment

By Dave (Basking Ridge, NJ 07920)
on August 18th, 2014

Bike programs may not reduce net carbon emissions by very much but I think it is a positive sign of a deeper local sentiment to do that. In that sense although transportation tends not to be the biggest source of emissions for a city I think things like urban bike programs might be a green bellwether. The global poster child green city - Copenhagen - is officially the first Bike City in the World and has provided inspiration for urban cycling programs and projects around the world. Copenhagen also has electric car sharing. Copenhagen is on its way to becoming the first carbon neutral capital city by 2025. So why not New York or Minneapolis? What needs to be done for major US cities to get there too?

Reply to this comment

By Wolfgang (Aix-en-Provence, France)
on August 19th, 2014

Bike-sharing must be seen as only one part of multi-modality, and the emission reductions come from that. Once you reach a certain density of bicycles (shared or not), you notice a regime shift in urban transport: more and more people feel safe on bicycles (or on foot), and this then triggers the reduction in car traffic. In addition, multi-modality really requires active measures to render city-traffic by car more difficult. After all, most cities currently provide huge incentives ONLY for car traffic, why should that not be questioned? Once you have all these things together (like in Copenhagen or Amsterdam), there is likely going to be a very significant reduction in emissions.

Reply to this comment

By Scott Williamson (Washington, DC 20009)
on August 19th, 2014

I think it is probably better to think of climate benefits in a longitudinal way.  How much does bike-sharing service expand the capacity for people to take trips every day?  How much, therefore, is there room for more people to live in city centers, where trips are shorter and all modes less emissions-intensive?  How much does bike-share, by lowering cost of a trip that might be a bit too far to walk (say, 2 miles), open up a neighborhood where many people wouldn’t have been able to afford both high rent and a car?  How much does it improve transit by serving as a backup mode if someone misses the last bus/train?  (i.e. what is the “option value” of bike share, even when not taken?)

By making cities more relatively appealing than suburbs, where land-use and transportation is more emissions-intensive, bike share has the capacity (as a package with other improvements) to indirectly impact emissions by changing the demand for different land-use forms.  Making cities so awesome that everyone wants to live there, and meeting that demand through human-scale infill development, could be a very significant emissions-reduction achievement over the next generation, as the US adds 50 million more people to its census count.

Thank you for this article!

Reply to this comment

By David Zetland (Amsterdam )
on August 19th, 2014

The best way (biggest market gain) to promote sharing (or rental) is as a substitute for mass trans or a taxi. Cheaper, faster, more fun.

Reply to this comment

By Eugene (Chicago, IL)
on August 21st, 2014

Does anyone know if there have been any injuries severely impacting quality of life while riding a rented bike?  Paralyzed, loss of limb type stuff?

Reply to this comment

Name (required):
Email (required):
City/State/Zip:
Enter the word "climate" in the box below:

[+] View our comment guidelines.

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment will not appear until reviewed by Climate Central staff. Thank you for your patience.