News Section
Stories from Climate Central's Science Journalists and Content Partners

Arctic Sea Ice On Pace for a Record Low in September

The melting season is now fully under way in the high Arctic. Months of relatively warm temperatures and nearly continuous sunshine have taken their toll on the ice that blankets the Arctic Ocean. By mid-September, the sea ice will reach its low point for the year, before starting its annual re-freeze. All of this is normal, but the conditions scientists are seeing this year are anything but normal. “Right now,” said Mark Serreze, director of the National Snow and Ice Data Center in Boulder, Colo., in an interview, “we’re on a record pace for ice loss. If the melt stopped today, we’d have the fourth lowest ice coverage on record.”

CryoSat determines variations in the thickness of floating sea-ice so that seasonal and interannual variations can be detected.
Credit: ESA /AOES Medialab

According to Serreze and other ice experts, we may be on the verge of an all-time low for Arctic ice coverage. In fact, as of August 12, Arctic sea ice extent had fallen below the level for the date seen in the record melt year of 2007. A new report just out from the Study of Environmental Arctic Change, or SEARCH, forecasts that sea ice coverage should dwindle to just 4.3 million square kilometers by mid-September. If that turns out to be correct it would come very close to beating the all-time record of 4.28 million square kilometers, set in 2007 — and given the uncertainties in the forecast this far out, the 2007 record could easily fall. 

That’s worrisome enough by itself: the less ice covering the Arctic Ocean, the more of the Sun’s energy the underlying seawater absorbs, which ultimately leads to even more melting, along with generally higher Arctic temperatures overall. But preliminary readings from the European CryoSat-2 show that the remaining ice is far thinner than normal, which means that an especially warm spell, either now or sometime in the next few years, could melt a huge area of ice very quickly.

It’s not entirely clear why this year’s meltback is proceeding so fast. On average, thanks to global warming, there’s been less ice each summer since 1979, when satellite observations of the North Polar Region began (before that, scientists had to rely on random observations by ships and planes). But the drop hasn’t been a steady one, thanks to weather patterns that might speed melting one year and hold it back the next. The all-time record minimum in ice cover came in September of 2007; since then, there’s been a very slight rebound.

That may now be at an end. This year’s plunge in sea ice may be in part due to a huge cyclonic storm — like a tropical storm, only much chillier — that struck the Arctic during the first week of August. “It’s one of the strongest I’ve seen in more than 20 years,” Serreze said. Such storms typically break up sea ice, allowing it to melt more quickly; they also churn up warmer, saltier water from beneath the surface, which accelerates the melting.  Sure enough, Serreze said, “we saw very rapid ice loss.” But there’s no smoking gun, he said, that proves the storm was the primary reason for ice loss. “The place with the biggest loss was the East Siberian Sea, where the ice was already poised to go.”

Whether this year’s ice loss ends up being worse than the melting in 2007 isn’t the most important question. “What is worrying,” said CryoSat-2 mission scientist Mark Drinkwater in an email, “is the reductions in volume and mass of the sea ice.” The reason is simple: if you’re just looking at how much of the Arctic Ocean is covered by ice, a thin layer is just as good as a thick layer. But a thin layer can melt much more easily, whether buffeted by storms or not, and decades of summer melting have thinned the ice dramatically. “Perhaps most disturbing,” Drinkwater said, “is the fact that current models would appear to be significantly underestimating the true values.”

In short, the new data confirm what scientists have been seeing for several years now: the ice is thinning a lot faster than climate models originally predicted it would, and while no one knows for sure when the first truly ice-free summer in the Arctic Ocean will come, it could plausibly be within years, not decades. That would be terrible news for seals and polar bears, but it could also accelerate the warming of the entire planet.

Open water will warm the ocean itself, which could undermine the glaciers on nearby Greenland. The generally warmer conditions could also speed the melting of permafrost on land in Alaska, Canada and Russia. That could release extra heat-trapping carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, which would further turbo charge global warming. So could the release of methane as plant material decays in soggy marshes, or escapes from hydrate deposits on the sea floor.

As for this year’s melting, it’s always possible that the weather could change and the current rate of ice loss could slow. Even if that happens, however, Arctic summer sea ice seems to be heading, more or less inexorably, to record low territory. Eventually, climate scientists say, the Arctic Ocean is likely to be nearly ice-free during the summer, if current trends continue.


By darian (sj/ca/95126)
on August 14th, 2012

  If and when arctic ice completely melts in the summer, does that mean that the lack of the natural temperature stabilizing effect of ice will translate to rapid temperature increases on a scale never seen before?  There is a simple experiment to demonstrate this: Heat a sauce pan filled with water and ice and monitor its temperature with a thermometer.  You’ll see that the temperature stays constant until that moment that all the ice has melted and then the water temperature rockets.
  Ive always wondered about this but never heard any analysis on the subject.

Reply to this comment

By Byron Smith (Edinburgh)
on August 15th, 2012

The storm doesn’t just have a mechanical effect on thin ice, breaking it up and dispersing it into pieces with a larger cumulative surface area (and so which melt faster), it also churns the waters, mixing the top layer (which is colder and fresher) with slightly warmer and saltier water a few hundred metres down. Warmer and saltier water is more efficient at melting ice.

Reply to this comment

By Daniel Kirk-Davidoff
on August 15th, 2012

@Darian:  it’s an interesting question.  The ocean has a lot of heat capacity, even aside from the latent heat of melting of ice, but there’s no question that the presence of ice results in air temperatures sticking pretty close to freezing all summer long.  Once all the summertime ice is gone, you’d certainly expect the temperatures to rise more rapidly.  I looked at a few of the simulations in the CMIP5 model runs (that will go into the IPCC AR5 report).  They show an effect like this:  the multi-model mean is pretty stable until around the year 2000, and then predicts summer time maximum Arctic sea surface temperatures rising to about 2 °C by 2100 (I averaged over the cap north of 80°N latitude).  But some individual model runs get quite a bit warmer- the NOAA GFDL model, for example, has Arctic SST’s up to about 5 °C (41 °F) by 2100.  People are no doubt writing papers as we speak looking at the weather changes in the Northern Hemisphere that accompany this change.

Reply to this comment

By mlemonick
on August 15th, 2012

Byron Smith makes an excellent point, and I’ll update the story to include it. Thanks!

Reply to this comment

By netdr (75023)
on August 16th, 2012

Since the north pole has been ice free for many centuries why didn’t the polar bears go extinct ?

Did they tread water for 100 years ?

Reply to this comment

By martin Harrison (frankfurt)
on August 18th, 2012

[answer to netdr] I’m as worried about the polar bears as I am about us!  Climate Science used to tell us not to worry about the Arctic because it will only melt in 2070.  Now here we are and AMEG are predicting ice-free by 2015. What about all the methane trapped on the ocean floor?

Reply to this comment

By david grondin (04463)
on August 20th, 2012

i spend my free time as a artist informing people of earth the problems we face. I even, started an earth ranger group to others active. News like this makes me want to do more smile

Reply to this comment

By Tracy Vieting (vancouver wa 98664)
on August 21st, 2012

I am also worried about the polar bears.

How can we change? I am doing my part

Reply to this comment

Name (required):
Email (required):
Enter the word "climate" in the box below:

[+] View our comment guidelines.

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment will not appear until reviewed by Climate Central staff. Thank you for your patience.