News Section
Stories from Climate Central's Science Journalists and Content Partners

Derelict Oil Wells May Be Major Methane Emitters

Repost This

A study of abandoned oil and gas wells in Pennsylvania finds that the hundreds of thousands of such wells in the state may be leaking methane, suggesting that abandoned wells across the country could be a bigger source of climate changing greenhouse gases than previously thought.

The study by Mary Kang, a Princeton University scientist, looked at 19 wells and found that these oft-forgotten wells are leaking various amounts of methane. There are hundreds of thousands of such oil and gas wells, long abandoned and plugged, in Pennsylvania alone, and countless more in oil and gas fields across the country. These wells go mostly unmonitored, and rarely, if ever, checked for such leaks.

An orphan oil well in Louisiana.
Credit: Louisiana Dept. of Natural Resources

A growing list of studies conducted over the past three years has suggested that crude oil and natural gas development, particularly in shale formations, are significant sources of methane leaks — emissions not fully included in U.S. Environmental Protection Agency greenhouse gas inventories because they are rarely monitored. Scientists say there is inadequate data available for them to know where all the leaks are and how much methane is leaking.

Methane is about 34 times as potent as a climate change-fueling greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide over a span of 100 years. Over 20 years, it’s 86 times more potent. Of all the greenhouse gases emitted by humans worldwide, methane contributes more than 40 percent of all radiative forcing, a measure of trapped heat in the atmosphere and a measuring stick of a changing climate.

So when abandoned oil and gas wells — possibly hundreds of thousands of them in Pennsylvania alone — that are not currently included in any federal estimate for total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions are found to be leaking methane, the implications could be significant.

Kang directly measured leaks from the abandoned wells and found that all 19 wells in the study tested positive for methane leaks, some more than others.

She found that overall, the wells leak so much methane that if leaks from all the abandoned wells in Pennsylvania are added up, the leaks could account for between 4 percent and 13 percent of human-caused methane emissions in the state.

But because of significant uncertainty about the total number of abandoned and plugged wells that exist in Pennsylvania, more study is needed to fully understand how common leaking abandoned wells are in the state and how much methane they may emit.

Nobody knows exactly how many abandoned oil and gas wells exist in Pennsylvania, but the study says that historical records show there are between 280,000 and 970,000 abandoned oil and gas wells. Pennsylvania is the site of one of America’s earliest discoveries of crude oil, at Oil Creek in 1859, and the state is considered the birthplace of the petroleum industry in the U.S.

Kang’s study found that state regulations do not appear to be effective at controlling methane emissions from abandoned wells because the rules focus on containing fluids, not gases, and the plugged wells are not required to be monitored closely over time.

More study is needed of similar abandoned and plugged oil and gas wells in other states for scientists to be able to estimate methane emissions from similar wells elsewhere, Kang’s study says.

Kang declined to comment because the study is currently under review by a scientific journal and may be published later this summer.

"Measuring methane losses from abandoned oil and gas wells is important,” Robert Jackson, a professor of global environmental change at Duke University, said. Jackson’s own research has shown methane leaks are a hazard in natural gas distribution systems in the U.S. “The emissions from single wells were relatively small, but there are hundreds of thousands of such wells in Pennsylvania alone. The total emissions could be as much as one eighth of all methane released by human activities in the state."

He said the next step in this research is to obtain a larger sample size of oil and gas wells across a broader area.  

“That way we'll obtain a better handle on losses across the state and country,” Jackson said.

Kang’s is one of the few studies to clearly demonstrate and quantify methane leaks from abandoned and plugged wells, said Cornell University biogeochemistry professor Robert Howarth, who is known for his research into methane emissions from natural gas operations.

When estimating greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S., the EPA estimates gas leakage from individual of oil and gas equipment during each step in the oil and gas exploration and production process. That method is called a “bottom-up” approach, which estimates emissions being emitted on the ground. The opposite method, called a “top-down” approach, estimates emissions based on aerial measurements taken from above sources of greenhouse gas emissions.

An oil well in Pennsylvania.
Credit: Nicholas A. Tonelli/flickr

A “bottom-up” approach is often flawed because it leaves out certain sources of greenhouse gases that may leak from unexpected places, Howarth said.

“This new study shows one of these left-out sources: the plugged and abandoned wells,” he said.

Kang’s study “supports what I and many others have been saying for many years, and that’s this: There is methane leaking from oil and gas wells. Period,” said Cornell University environmental engineering professor Anthony Ingraffea, who has collaborated with Howarth on methane emissions research and is currently analyzing Kang’s work.

The study is further evidence that there is too little data available for scientists to fully understand how much methane is leaking from oil and gas fields in the U.S., both from producing wells and abandoned wells in addition to natural gas distribution systems, he said.

Terry Engelder, a geosciences professor at Pennsylvania State University known for his controversial calculations of shale gas reserves existing in Pennsylvania's Marcellus shale formation, said that while methane is clearly leaking from abandoned wells, it's unlikely that all of the state's abandoned and plugged wells are leaking. 

Leakage may depend on the specific geologic formation a well taps because wells in some formations would release much gas early in the drilling process and much less, if any, later on, he said. 

"(The) flaw in the Kang study is that she tells the reader nothing about the wells she is sampling," such as the well depth and the formation into which the well was drilled to produce oil or gas, Engelder said. 

The idea that abandoned wells leak methane isn’t a new idea, but Kang’s work provides some new data for scientists to work with, said Lawrence Cathles, a Cornell earth and atmospheric sciences professor who is known for his criticism of Howarth and Ingraffea’s work.

“I don’t think presently leaking wells will change our perspective on greenhouse warming because their leakage has already been accommodated by the climate system and methane is only 20 to 30 percent the total greenhouse forcing at present,” Cathles said via email. “What matters is how methane leakage changes in the future. If the well leakage is significant, reducing it in historic wells might reduce greenhouse forcing somewhat (and thus present a remedial opportunity).”

He said it might be beneficial to minimize future methane leakage from abandoned oil and gas wells if Kang’s research holds up to scientific scrutiny.

You May Also Like
Roaring Video Shows Record Flood at Brazil’s Iguazu Falls
Of Brazil, the World Cup and Climate Change
A New Spin on Mapping U.S. Tornado Touchdowns
Clean Power Plan Follows Uneven CO2 Emissions Trend

Comments

By Dave (Basking Ridge, NJ 07920)
on June 19th, 2014

Bobby:

Interesting piece.  Methane emissions are undeniably of great concern. As a point of central detail, the current detailed GWP estimates for methane and the related discussions over what timescale is most appropriate to use and hence what GWP number to use are also very relevant here. I wonder if you could clarify where your particular unreferenced 40+% radiative forcing RF contribution from methane statement comes from. Namely:

“Of all the greenhouse gases emitted by humans worldwide, methane contributes more than 40 percent of all radiative forcing, a measure of trapped heat in the atmosphere and a measuring stick of a changing climate.”

For instance, according to 2011 data presented in the IPCC AR5 (ch.8, Physical Science Basis, tables 8.2, 8.6) the relative global mean RF contribution of methane is instead in the region of 17% (ignoring the uncertainty spread), rising only a couple of points if one compares it to total ERF and also includes the effect of the negative forcing from (non gaseous) aerosols.

Reply to this comment

By Ross L Poling (Croolsville Ohio 43731)
on July 20th, 2014

I agree but the state of Pa has laws on the books that wells left the state will plug this wells, so that is the states fault for letting this happen. The people a local level are the ones in this case is liable for this infraction and should be punished just like they would do.

Reply to this comment

By Steve Yang, P.E. (Moffett Field, California, 94035)
on June 20th, 2014

I am glad Ms. Kang did her report and shared it with the public.  It is not fair to discredit her work by saying it lacks this and that.  Ms. Kang did a public service by pointing out what she saw.  It is up to the regulators to followup and get a better assessment of these fugitive emissions.
On the other hand, Prof. Engelder and Prof. Cathles and others could contribute to this topic by providing their knowledge about the geology of the wells involved and add to Ms. Kang’s work with their interpretations.

Reply to this comment

By H. Springman (High Springs, FL, 32643)
on July 15th, 2014

Indeed, unless Mr. Engelder has received a full copy of Ms. Kang’s research it may be his assumption that is flawed. It would be nice to know if Ms. Kang’s study has taken to account the geology of the areas monitored if not it should be part of her continuing work.

Reply to this comment

By Michael Berndtson (Berwyn, IL)
on June 20th, 2014

I’m going to guess that when a shale gas well (horizontal cluster) gets shut down, methane emissions from abandoned gas wells increases. This guess assumes that fractures are in communication with the wells somewhere along the subsurface strata. When a well is in operation, the formation pressure drops, but still the driving force for shale gas is towards the fractures and up into the wellhead. A rogue fracture may be sufficiently far that the pressure differential is higher in the direction of the old abandoned well versus towards the fractured well sink (the horizontal run). When the well is shut off or capped, the formation pressure tends to recover. This will accelerate movement towards abandoned wells even more. There will be a lot of capped fractured wells. Those fractures don’t get grouted up like the well vertical run. This could be bad. Or not.

Reply to this comment

By Paul J. Taylor (Raleigh, NC 27604)
on June 23rd, 2014

I have an idea:  let’s stop arguing about exactly how much damage greenhouse gasses do and start working on eliminating them!!!

Reply to this comment

By Niklaus Ploetze (London, England)
on June 26th, 2014

The leaking of methane from derelict or abandoned wells has been known for decades. The fact that there are now significantly more due to the evolving/rolling extraction of shale gas and tight oil will mean - well, more of the same, only now the likelihood is merely significantly greater.

All well casings fail - sooner or later… and the US and other countries are storing up deep problems (every pun intended) for future generations.

With the well-known fact that all well casings fail sooner or later, and with methane patiently waiting an opportunity to vent to atmosphere, one could argue that shale gas/tight oil extraction will be more damaging to the environment than coal-fired electricity generation.

The above is equally true for all oil/gas exploration.

The potential damage to the biosphere is extraordinarily high, and with methane hydrates/clathrates being increasingly destabilised by ever warmer oceans and methane being released in vast plumes in the arboreal regions, this doesn’t bode well at all for life as we know it..

By blindly and blithely sorting out the short-term whilst manfully/womanfully ignoring the long-term, we endanger our world and all that we hold dear.

In the UK, we’re fighting a loosing battle against the frackers and oil exploration companies, but we fight on…

Reply to this comment

By Nathanael (Ithaca, NY)
on July 8th, 2014

Consistent methane capture from these abandoned wells could both reduce methane emissions and supply us with a supply of methane for cooking and industrial processes.  Traditional oil exploration has been extraordinarily wasteful.

Reply to this comment

By carroll osteen (32068)
on July 14th, 2014

I say “fantastic"do not have to drill new wells. just get the free methane and sell it or give it to hospitals or other institutions like these to use as fuel for heating and power generation! we should quit trying to demonize our available fuel resources and start using ALL of them while developing alternatives.

Reply to this comment

By vance everson (elgin/IL/60124 )
on July 22nd, 2014

the amount of methane leaking from each pump probably isn’t enough to make it economically viable to try and collect it. if it were- you can bet that oil companies or someone else would be doing it already. if it’s one or two wells trickling methane it isn’t really a big problem- but multiply it by hundreds of thousands, and it starts to become one.

Reply to this comment

By Dave (55438)
on July 16th, 2014

I agree with carroll osteen as lots of these environmental issues turn into pissing contests instead of looking at it from a practical standpoint and solve it that way. It appears that in many cases “Common Sense in not that common”,eh?

Reply to this comment

By Alan Locklear (Portland Oregon 97221)
on July 19th, 2014

Locating, testing, and repairing/re-sealing all those leaking wells could put a lot of pipeline workers, welders, iron workers and others in the oil trade to work doing some productive with their skills.  It should be done at the oil companies’ expense, of course. Heck, they might even find wells leaking enough methane to be worth capturing and selling. The economics of such things are a lot different now than they were when the wells were abandoned decades ago.

Reply to this comment

By Nostromov (Belgrade/Serbia/11000)
on July 24th, 2014

ROTFLMAO *between* 1,000,000 abandoned wells - leaking methane.. Yay, let’s wreck the planet and fill our pockets; w00t! \o/

Reply to this comment

Name (required):
Email (required):
City/State/Zip:
Enter the word "climate" in the box below:

[+] View our comment guidelines.

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment will not appear until reviewed by Climate Central staff. Thank you for your patience.