News Section
Stories from Climate Central's Science Journalists and Content Partners

Squid Threatened by Ocean Acidity Caused by Rise in CO2

By Tim Radford, Climate News Network

LONDON – That jet-propelled cephalopod of the seas, the squid, could be in for a hard time. As atmospheric carbon dioxide levels rise, so the oceans become more acid, and this is not good news for one of the most important animals of the ocean ecosystem.

Aran Mooney of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in the U.S. and other colleagues decided to take a look at what changing pH levels might do for the creature sometimes served up diced into rings, and fried, as calamari, or sometimes as the sauce in a pasta, cooked in its own ink.   

Scientists reported squid raised in the highly acidic water took longer to develop, were 5 percent smaller on average, and some developed malformed statoliths – carbonate crystals that help the squid orient itself while swimming.
Credit: Tokyo Sea Life Park

The researchers took both male and female longfin squid – a commercially-prized variety – from the waters of Vineyard Sound off the coast of Massachusetts and kept them in a laboratory tank until they mated. Some of the eggs were transferred to an experimental tank, some kept in existing seawater.

Experiments

One sample tank in effect “breathed” today’s air. The other was subjected to air enriched with higher carbon dioxide levels – dissolving as carbonic acid – until the tank water reached the higher acidity levels predicted 100 years from now. Then they noted how the baby squid developed.

The scientists reported in the journal PLoS One that animals raised in the highly acidic water took longer to develop, were 5 percent smaller on average, and some developed malformed statoliths – carbonate crystals that help the squid orient itself while swimming.

Food chain

“The fact that we found an impact in everything we measured was pretty astounding,” said Dr. Mooney. “Squid are at the center of the ocean ecosystem – nearly all animals are eating or eaten by squid. So if anything happens to these guys, it has repercussions up the food chain and down the food chain.”

In 2011 U.S. fishermen landed $100 million worth of squid: the creature is also food for tuna and hake, both commercially valuable catches.

The next step in the research is to look at the effects of differing acidic levels and on the impact of changing sea temperatures.  Climate change isn’t the only challenge that confronts the creatures of the sea: overfishing and ocean pollution are also big and growing problems. But warm water fish can migrate to cooler temperatures, and have already begun to do so.

Struggle to adapt

Governments can regulate fish catches and establish marine reserves – and have begun to do so. But the research into the changing chemistry of the seas really is a voyage of discovery: animals evolved over millions of years to adapt very precisely to today’s conditions, and as they develop they quite literally fashion themselves with the materials in the sea water around them.

Swift changes in ocean chemistry – and in evolutionary terms, a century is a very short time – could affect ocean ecosystems in unprecedented and unpredictable ways.

Tim Radford is a reporter for Climate News Network. Climate News Network is a news service led by four veteran British environmental reporters and broadcasters. It delivers news and commentary about climate change for free to media outlets worldwide.

Comments

By russ george (vancouver, bc, v5n2x1)
on June 19th, 2013

The crisis of CO2 is two fold. Yesterday’s CO2 amounts to most of a trillion tonnes already emitted into the air on its way to dissolve in the oceans. This dose of CO2 is only about 1/3 absorbed by the oceans, the remaining 2/3 is on its way regardless of what we might do to reduce our adding more CO2 to the air. This first dose is demonstrably a deadly dose for myriad ocean species. Tomorrows dose of CO2 which we have yet to emit but are sure to do so is a second lethal dose of CO2 for the oceans.

Which dose of CO2 is most urgent for us to deal with? I maintain it is the first deadly dose. It’s as if when an emergency room doctor receives a patient who has taken a deadly overdose instead of treating the overdose sends the patient to the psych ward for counselling so that they can be helped to not take a second lethal dose. The of course perish from the first dose but they do so in the psych ward so the emergency department doesn’t have to log another death in their care.

The CO2 in the oceans can be easily and inexpensively treated and become ocean life instead of ocean death. If we restore ocean plankton pastures to the condition of health they were in 50 years ago billions of tonnes of deadly CO2 will become ocean life. This may cost mere millions not billions. That low cost and the immediate utility of ocean restoration has made the topic controversial by the intense lobbying efforts of those who fund their lives through the constant selling of the doomsday scenario of climate change. You can read about the hope for the oceans at my blog at www.russgeorge.net

Reply to this comment

Name (required):
Email (required):
City/State/Zip:
Enter the word "climate" in the box below:

[+] View our comment guidelines.

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment will not appear until reviewed by Climate Central staff. Thank you for your patience.