News Section
Stories from Climate Central's Science Journalists and Content Partners

Norway to Double Carbon Tax on Oil Industry

Severin Carrell, Scotland correspondent, The Guardian

Norway is to double carbon tax on its North Sea oil industry and set up a $1.6 billion fund to help combat the damaging impacts of climate change in the developing world.

In one of the most radical climate programs yet by an oil-producing nation, the Norwegian government has proposed increasing its carbon tax on offshore oil companies by $72 (Nkr410) per ton of CO2 and an $8 (Nkr50) per ton CO2 tax on its fishing industry.

Ekofisk oil platform in the North Sea, Norway. The Norwegian government has proposed increasing its carbon tax on offshore oil companies. Credit: Ulrich Baumgarten/Getty Images

Norway will also plough an extra $1.75 billion (Nkr10bn) into its funds for climate change mitigation, renewable energy, food security in developing countries and conversion to low-carbon energy sources, Environmental Finance reported.

It will step up spending on new projects to combat deforestation in developing countries to $707 million, taking up its spending overall on forestry programs to $525 million. Previous forestry projects have involved Brazil, Indonesia and Ethiopia.

The Oslo government is also to spend $110 million on buying carbon credits in 2013, to help offset its emissions, force through new building regulations to make all new homes carbon-neutral by 2015 and increase efforts to heavily cut emissions from cars, switching to electric vehicles.

The scale of these initiatives will pose a significant political challenge to other oil-producing nations, who are also investing in low-carbon technologies and cutting their own emissions, but not yet investing heavily in tackling the impacts of climate change on developing countries.

The UK and Scottish governments estimate there are up to 24 billion barrels of oil left to be exploited over the next 40 years from the UK's oil and gas fields in the North Sea, west of Shetland and smaller sites off western England.

But that would lead to total CO2 emissions of an extra 10 billion tons — dwarfing the UK's annual 500 million tons of CO2 emissions, at a time when many climate scientists urge cutbacks in oil, gas and coal use to avoid significant global warming and to meet climate targets.

Neither the UK or Scottish government has supported a carbon tax on the oil and gas industry.

The Scottish government, which often looks to Norway as a model for its independence plans, has greatly increased its funding and support for renewable energy investment. It announced a $165 million investment fund for marine renewables and community power schemes on Wednesday and has a $643 million "climate justice fund" to help developing countries.

But fields in Scottish waters account for about 80 percent of the UK's North Sea oil and gas fields, which produced 1 million barrels of oil a day in August.

Alex Salmond, Scotland's first minister, said on Wednesday that oil economies have a "moral obligation" to increase low-carbon energy and tackle climate change, but says there is no contradiction in maximizing oil, gas and coal production.

He told a conference on low-carbon investment: "As countries such as Denmark show, there's no contradiction between making use of substantial in their case gas reserves which will be needed by the rest of the world in the coming decades by the rest of the world, while leading the transition to a low-carbon economy."

Credit: flickr/ Daniel Gasienica

After speaking at the same conference on Thursday, Ed Davey, the UK energy and climate secretary, told the Guardian he believed the UK's actions on climate change and green energy were also world-leading. The UK government was putting $4.82 billion into the new green investment bank, and aims to cut CO2 emissions by 34 percent by 2020, he said.

Asked about Norway's new program, Davey said: "I would say that the UK government has very ambitious climate change targets and carbon emission reduction targets.

"We were one of the first countries in the world to pass legally binding targets on ourselves, with the Climate Change Act 2008 which had cross party support. And the government has introduced on the back of that, the fourth carbon budget and the whole electricity market reform, the green deal, the green investment bank.

"These are all our tools to deliver on those targets; these are incredibly ambitious and maybe some countries are catching us up."

Ranking third among the world's oil exporters, with production peaking at 3 million barrels of oil a day, Norway has 51 active oil and gas fields in the North Sea, and believes it has more than 7 billion barrels of undiscovered reserves. Its oil and gas sector is the world's richest: its employees earn $180,000 on average a year.

With a population of 5 million — the same as Scotland — it is the third wealthiest country per capita in the world thanks to its oil and gas exports. Norway's plans to offset the impacts of its oil exports on the world's climate come as it also proposes to expand oil exploration into the Barents Sea to the far north.

Richard Dixon, director of WWF Scotland, said: "Norway is showing how you can use oil income to fund the transition out of oil, we should be doing the same with UK oil revenues. The Scottish National Party have always been keen on the Norwegian oil fund, and now it is setting an example really worth following."

Reprinted from The Guardian with permission.


By Dave (Basking Ridge, NJ 07920)
on October 13th, 2012

It would be nice to see follow up articles from climate central of this type - perhaps emphasizing how the US and other large emitters compare.

Thanks for the information.

BTW: 2/3rds down I believe it should read $4.82 bn and not $482 billion.

Reply to this comment

By Gunnar Steinsholt
on October 15th, 2012

I am sorry to say that I am not as impressed, as Severin Carrell seems to be, by the doubling of the caron tax. The reason is that this is done just to compensate for the low prises in the ETS wich meens that teh Norwegian oil industri today pays less to pullute than a few years ago. It is true that Norway spend a considerable amount on money on saving rainforest around the world. But at the same time Norways Souvereing Wealth Fund, wich ranges among the worlds largest, invests in a wide range of companies that are involved in forrest degrading activities. The fund is also heavely invested in the coal-industri. But the biggest problem is Norways lack of will to limit its oil-industri expantion to the north, steadily finding new fossil resources that should be left in the ground. Norway is not making any steps towards a transition to a post-carbon society, neither at home nor abroad. Norways policy is aimed at prolonging the lifetime of its very proffitable oil and gass industri as long as possible.

Reply to this comment

Name (required):
Email (required):
Enter the word "climate" in the box below:

[+] View our comment guidelines.

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment will not appear until reviewed by Climate Central staff. Thank you for your patience.