Greenhouse Gas Emissions Rate Puts Billion More at Risk
By Paul Brown, Climate News Network
London − Allowing the Earth’s temperature to rise by more than 3.6ºF will see dramatic changes in vegetation across the planet and expose a billion more people to severe water scarcity, according to new research.
So vast are the potential changes that the scientists from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) in Germany comment that they doubt if humans have the capacity to manage the impacts it will have.
Allowing the Earth’s temperature to rise by more than 3.6ºF will see dramatic changes in vegetation across the planet and expose 500 million more people to severe water scarcity.
Credit: UNICEF East Asia & Pacific/flickr
A temperature rise of 9°F would cause all ice-free land on the planet to experience dramatic changes in its ecosystems — for example, tundra turning to forests and African grasslands to deserts.
In a paper published today in the international scientific journal Earth System Dynamics, the scientists say they are surprised at how much worse the impacts would become once the 3.6ºF threshold is passed. At the moment, they say, the failure of politicians to make commitments to cut emissions means that the temperature is set to reach and pass the danger zone of 6.3ºF.
While the scientists spell out what will happen to the vegetation and the water availability, they do not venture into predicting what conflict might arise if a billion people or more whose food supply would collapse embarked on mass migration to avoid starvation.
The “green” areas of the world most affected are the grasslands of Eastern India, shrub lands of the Tibetan Plateau, the forests of Northern Canada, and the savannas of Ethiopia and Somalia. The melting permafrost of the Siberian tundra will also be significant, releasing further greenhouse gases.
The changes in vegetation are only part of the story. The report also concentrates on the effect of temperature on water shortages for the human population. Even if global warming is limited to 3.6ºF above pre-industrial levels, another 500 million people could suffer water scarcity, and this will grow substantially as the temperature rises.
Dr. Dieter Gerten, research expert on water scarcity, and lead author of one of the three studies contained in the PIK paper, said mean global warming of 3.6ºF — the target set by the international community — is projected to expose an additional 8 percent of humankind to new or increased water scarcity.
However, a rise of 6.3°F — likely to occur if national emissions reductions remain at currently pledged levels — would affect 11 percent of the world population, while a rise of 9°F could increase this to 13 percent.
Areas of the Tibetan Plateau, such as the Deosai Plains in Pakistan, could become deserts if the emissions rate isn't cut now.
Credit: Kashiff, Wikimedia Commons via Climate News Network
“If population growth continues, by the end of our century under a business-as-usual scenario these figures would equate to well over one billion lives touched,” Gerten says. “And this is on top of the more than one billion people already living in water-scarce regions today.”
Parts of Asia, North Africa, the Mediterranean and the Middle East are particularly vulnerable to further water scarcity. The eastern side of the United States and northern Mexico, already short of water, will suffer further stress.
Maps published with the paper show the areas most at risk from both water shortages and vegetation changes. One of the worst affected regions is an area that includes Pakistan and the border area of India — which is already suffering from floods, droughts and a subsequent loss of crop production.
The scientists use their findings to show that the current world leaders have the key to the fate of the planet. If they reduce emissions now, they could prevent the worst of the temperature rises, but if they fail to do so the consequences will be dire.
The paper says a warming of 9ºF — likely to happen in the next century if climate change goes on unabated — would put nearly all terrestrial natural ecosystems at risk of severe change. “So despite the uncertainties, the findings clearly demonstrate that there is a large difference in the risk of global ecosystem change under a scenario of no climate change mitigation, compared to one of ambitious mitigation,” says geo-ecologist Sebastian Ostberg, lead author of the third section of the study.
While the report does not speculate on the actual effects these changes will have on the ability of the human population to survive, the scientists permit themselves the observation that it is hard to see how humans can adapt to such rapid changes.
Much more irrigation would be needed to grow the same amount of food, the scientists suggest, but this would put even more strain on scarce resources.
Paul Brown is a joint editor for Climate News Network. Climate News Network is a news service led by four veteran British environmental reporters and broadcasters. It delivers news and commentary about climate change for free to media outlets worldwide.