News Section
Stories from Climate Central's Science Journalists and Content Partners

Climate Change is Already Damaging Global Economy

By Fiona Harvey, The Guardian

Climate change is already contributing to the deaths of nearly 400,000 people a year and costing the world more than $1.2 trillion, wiping 1.6 percent annually from global GDP, according to a new study.

The impacts are being felt most keenly in developing countries, according to the research, where damage to agricultural production from extreme weather linked to climate change is contributing to deaths from malnutrition, poverty, and their associated diseases.

Air pollution caused by the use of fossil fuels is also separately contributing to the deaths of at least 4.5 million people a year, the report found.

Impacts of climate change are mostly keenly felt in developing countries where damage to agricultural production from extreme weather is contributing to deaths from malnutrition, poverty and their associated diseases. 
Credit: NEWSCOM.

The 331-page study, entitled Climate Vulnerability Monitor: A Guide to the Cold Calculus of A Hot Planet and published on Wednesday, was carried out by the DARA group, a non-governmental organization based in Europe, and the Climate Vulnerable Forum. It was written by more than 50 scientists, economists and policy experts, and commissioned by 20 governments.

By 2030, the researchers estimate, the cost of climate change and air pollution combined will rise to 3.2 percent of global GDP, with the world's least developed countries forecast to bear the brunt, suffering losses of up to 11 percent of their GDP.

Sheikh Hasina, prime minister of Bangladesh, said: "A 1°C rise in temperature [temperatures have already risen by 0.7°C globally since the end of the 19th century] is associated with 10 percent productivity loss in farming. For us, it means losing about 4 million tonnes of food grain, amounting to about $2.5 billion. That is about 2 percent of our GDP. Adding up the damages to property and other losses, we are faced with a total loss of about 3-4 percent of GDP. Without these losses, we could have easily secured much higher growth."

But major economies will also take a hit, as extremes of weather and the associated damage — droughts, floods and more severe storms — could wipe 2 percent of the GDP of the U.S. by 2030, while similar effects could cost China $1.2 trillion by the same date.

Bangladeshi villagers rebuild an embankment after cyclone Aila hit in 2009. Bangladesh faces total losses of about 3-4% of GDP due to climate change. 
Credit: Munir Uz Zaman/AFP/Getty Images

While many governments have taken the view that climate change is a long-term problem, there is a growing body of opinion that the effects are already being felt. Scientists have been alarmed by the increasingly rapid melting of Arctic sea ice, which reached a new record minimum this year and, if melting continues at similar rates, could be ice free in summer by the end of the decade. Some research suggests that this melting could be linked to cold, dull and rainy summers in parts of Europe — such as has been the predominant summer weather in the UK for the last six years. In the U.S., this year's severe drought has raised food prices and in India the disruption to the monsoon has caused widespread damage to farmers.

Connie Hedegaard, the European Union's climate chief, warned that extreme weather was becoming more common, as the effects of climate change take hold. "Climate change and weather extremes are not about a distant future," she wrote in a comment for the Guardian last week. "Formerly one-off extreme weather episodes seem to be becoming the new normal."

Michael Zammit Cutajar, former executive secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, said: "Climate change is not just a distant threat but a present danger — its economic impact is already with us."

Reprinted with permission from The Guardian


By me me (Mich)
on September 29th, 2012

NOT ONE single IPCC warning is without “maybes” despite “being at the tipping point, maybe” and threatening the voter’s children with deaths by CO2 is as good as voting for Romneycon. Climate change was Liberalism’s Iraq War of Climate WMD lies and fear mongering.
*Occupywallstreet does not even mention CO2 in its list of demands because of the bank-funded carbon trading stock markets run by corporations.
*Obama has not mentioned the crisis in the last two State of the Unions addresses.
*Julian Assange is of course a climate change denier.
*Canada killed Y2Kyoto with a freely elected climate change denying prime minister and nobody cared, especially the millions of scientists warning us of unstoppable warming (a comet hit).
Meanwhile, the entire world of SCIENCE, lazy copy and paste journalism and Liberal progressivism had allowed bank-funded and corporate-run “CARBON TRADING STOCK MARKETS”(ruled by trustworthy politicians) to trump the UN’s and entire world’s efforts into 3rd world fresh water relief, starvation rescue and 3rd world education for just over 26 years of insane attempts at climate CONTROL.

Reply to this comment

By Stephan Luc Larose (Kelowna BC)
on September 30th, 2012

Funny, there is a world economic recession in progress but no one in the mainstream media is asking what economic benefits would ensue from a concerted global push to retrofit the entire global economy into a green one.

Clearly what is needed is a massive worldwide development project involving all the latest technologies to kick start the economy, and the end result will be a detoxified planet and an economy that benefits the biosphere instead of destroys it.

You’d probably have to divert military funds for a project of such an awesome scale, but shutting down the arms race for a while could have a calming effect on the globe and the pursuit of peace would be through development, not force of arms.

Reply to this comment

By Sean
on September 30th, 2012

Climate Change Religion is Already Damaging Fiona Harvey’s Brain

Reply to this comment

By Scott Reaney (AB)
on September 30th, 2012

The B.S. propaganda published for this article was completely destroyed by a little thing that we call ‘SCIENCE’, when climate scientists at Antarctica PROVED on September 30th that the polar ice cap has reached it’s highest level ever reported. EVER!
Do you plan on publishing a retraction to your blatant inaccuracies, or do you prefer your ‘agenda’ in lieu of the facts that have been proven by scientists, rather than zipper-headed tree-huggers?

Reply to this comment

Name (required):
Email (required):
Enter the word "climate" in the box below:

[+] View our comment guidelines.

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment will not appear until reviewed by Climate Central staff. Thank you for your patience.