News Section
Stories from Climate Central's Science Journalists and Content Partners

Government Shutdown Impacts Obama’s Climate Agenda

By Suzanne Goldenberg, The Guardian

About 94 percent of the employees of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have been sent on leave of absence as part of the U.S. government shutdown.

Nearly all of the agency's 16,205 employees across the country, with oversight of air quality, industrial waste, water and sewage treatment plants, have powered down their computers, updated their voicemail, filled in their last timesheets, and left buildings as part of the shutdown.

The shutdown has left National Parks shuttered and could affect the EPA's ability to implement Barack Obama's climate change agenda.
Credit: Rich Renomeron/Flickr

Only 1,069 essential staff – such as emergency personnel who deal with events posing an "imminent threat to human life" such as chemical spills or rail derailments – remained on duty. A few workers also stayed behind to feed lab animals and water test plants.

EPA officials said the shutdown would disrupt monitoring of air and water quality.

It could also set back the agency's efforts to advance Barack Obama's climate change agenda.

Employees are barred from checking government email, using government-issued cellphones during the furlough or catching up on any of their work for the duration of the shutdown.

"It stinks," said John O'Grady, a union representative at the EPA's Chicago office. "No one is going to be out inspecting water discharges, or wet lands. Nobody is going to be out inspecting waste water treatment plants, drinking water treatment plants, or landfills – nothing. None of that is going to be done. The employees are absolutely devastated."

He said most employees at the EPA had already lost about six days' pay due to leave since last April, and pay scales have been frozen since 2010.

The EPA is a prime target for the Republicans in Congress, who precipitated the government shutdown, because of its moves to limit the greenhouse gas emissions that cause climate change.

EPA officials had warned earlier that a shutdown could hurt Obama's climate change agenda. The agency was about to roll out new rules for promoting the use of biofuels, and tougher penalties against polluters.

The EPA was also working to set the first limits on carbon pollution from power plants – the pillar of Obama's climate change agenda. Those rules are still on course for release in June 2014 – but some Republicans on Tuesday still cheered the prospect of a shuttered EPA.

"There is some good news out of the shutdown, the EPA can't issue new regulations," Marsha Blackburn, a member of Congress from Tennessee, said on Twitter.

But EPA officials said there would be growing risk to public health if the shutdown lasted beyond a few days.

"It's like most of the other agencies. In the short term, the impact may not be terribly big, but over the long term, there is a cost to the work not getting done," said Jonathan Schweitzer, an environmental engineer at the agency and a veteran of the 1990s shutdown.

All environmental agencies are being affected by the shutdown, but only NASA is taking a bigger hit than the EPA.
Credit: Wayan Vota/Flickr

During the last shutdown, his team was forced to call off a planned inspection at a sewage treatment plant in the Chicago area. "During that time the treatment plant violated its discharge limits," he said. "In the long term if we can't review permits and pre-treatment programs, then states and municipalities will likely tend to slack off if nobody is keeping after them as far as their job is concerned protecting the waterways."

Other environmental agencies are being affected by the shutdown – but only NASA, the lead U.S. government agency for climate science research, is taking a bigger hit than the EPA.

Just 3 percent of workers at NASA remained on the job after Tuesday's shutdown. NASA's website and Twitter feed, like those at other agencies, were also down.

But mission control for the six U.S. astronauts at the international space station remained open, the agency said.

About half of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has been sent home without pay – mainly those dealing with climate change and oceans.

Hurricane spotters will stay on the job – the season runs through November 30 – but tornado watchers have been sent on leave, Climate Central reported.

Yosemite and other national parks and monuments were shut down, as was the panda cam at Washington's National Zoo, as 81 percent of workers at the interior department were furloughed.

The Department of Energy (DoE) also sent 69 percent of its workers home, closing down research and energy efficiency programs. Workers in charge of nuclear materials remained on the job, and so have staff at some of the DoE research labs for now.

Reprinted from The Guardian with permission.

Comments

By dan_in_illinois
on October 5th, 2013

“But EPA officials said there would be growing risk to public health if the shutdown lasted beyond a few days.”

Really?  The one example given was a delayed sewage inspection in Chicago the last time a shutdown occurred.  I think I can live with the consequences.

Reply to this comment

By Eric Peterson (Front Royal, VA 22630)
on October 9th, 2013

Oh no!  Not the panda cam!

Being both a beltway “insider” to an extent (working in Arlington) and outsider (live way out past the Blue Ridge) I hear two perspectives,  first from the insiders (and the media including this website) who think the world is going to come to an end.  The second is from the people in the rest of the country who realize that, other than taking their money and redistributing it, the federal government doesn’t do very much important work.

These are people who run butcher shops, which are state inspected, no need for the FDA.  Same with the entire flea / farmer market.  A lot of farmers get subsidies, but they are mostly small and they will be better off without them.  Some people who fix roads got some federal grants a few years ago as part of the stimulus.  But that’s gone now and good riddance as it was mostly wasted on roads that didn’t need fixing while others still do.  That’s the nature of politically redistributed money.  Are we supposed to be an entire country of insiders living off the grant?

I guess that might make sense to a British author who probably doesn’t understand what makes America strong.

Then there’s the “scientific” work like putting garbage data into models and “projecting” the end of the world.  Most people I explain that to understand how useless it is, mostly because they understand what weather is.

Reply to this comment

Name (required):
Email (required):
City/State/Zip:
Enter the word "climate" in the box below:

[+] View our comment guidelines.

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment will not appear until reviewed by Climate Central staff. Thank you for your patience.