News Section
Stories from Climate Central's Science Journalists and Content Partners

Hurricane Sandy’s Immense Energy Shook the U.S.

Repost This

By Tim Radford, Climate News Network

Sandy, the superstorm that all but submerged New York, was powerful enough to set U.S. earthquake detectors quivering long before it hit the American coastline.

It stirred up Atlantic Ocean waves that slammed into each other, started to shake the sea floor and then shook the Midwestern states so vigorously that the storm’s progress could be tracked by seismometer.

NASA's Aqua satellite captured a visible image Sandy's massive circulation.
Credit: NASA.

The windstorm-induced tremors were very tiny, and not unusual – and say as much about the sensitivity of modern seismometers as about the furious forces released in a superstorm.

But the episode – revealed at a recent meeting of the Seismological Society of America in Salt Lake City, Utah – is a reminder that the energies released by the dangerous mix of swirling winds and warm oceans are dramatic and, with global warming, could become even more frequent and more devastating.

“We detected seismic waves created by the ocean waves both hitting the East Coast and smashing into each other,” said Keith Koper, of the University of Utah seismic stations. And his colleague and fellow author of an as-yet-unpublished study, Oner Sufri, a doctoral student, said “As the storm turned west-northwest, the seismometers lit up.”

Sandy began in the Caribbean, developed into a hurricane – the largest Atlantic hurricane on record – and killed 285 people in seven countries, as well as causing an estimated $75 billion in damage. It hit 24 U.S. states and swept into New York on 29 October, by then classified as a superstorm.

Biennial superstorms?

Hurricanes generate phenomenal energies. One calculation is that the total energy released through clouds and rain during the average hurricane is about 200 times the capacity of all the world’s power stations. Another more graphic calculation is that during its lifespan, the average hurricane releases the energy of 10,000 nuclear bombs.

Hurricane Sandy started to shake the sea floor and then shook the Midwestern states so vigorously that the storm’s progress could be tracked by seismometer.
Credit: flickr/Jeff Cutler

Some of this marine mayhem was picked up by an array of 500 portable detectors called Earthscope. These were first placed in California in 2004, and have been leap-frogging eastwards across the US.

When Sandy developed, most of them were located in a band between Minnesota and east Texas, and Lake Erie and Florida. They were designed to tune in, a bit like a doctor’s stethoscope, to the Earth’s crust and the mantle below.

Sandy in effect helped geophysicists explore the fabric of the continental U.S. – but the tiny tremors in the crust also told the researchers about the progress of a storm far away.

Hurricanes become a predictable hazard as ocean surface temperatures rise, and in 2012 seas off the east coast of the U.S. were unusually warm.

Sandy was classified a very unusual event, a once-in-a-century storm, but researchers have warned that, as global temperatures rise, such storms could develop as often as every other year.

Tim Radford is a reporter for Climate News Network.  Climate News Network is a news service led by four veteran British environmental reporters and broadcasters. It delivers news and commentary about climate change for free to media outlets worldwide.

Comments

By Chris Squire-UK (Twickenham)
on May 4th, 2013

Re: “One calculation is that the total energy released through clouds and rain during the average hurricane is about 200 times the capacity of all the world’s power stations.”

This statement confuses ‘energy’ and ’power’ - not something I expect to read in a science blog. Does it mean anything? The only meaning I can suggest is that ‘the total energy released through clouds and rain during the average hurricane’ = 200 x power output of all the world’s power stations x duration of average hurricane’. Is that right?iIf so please provide a reference for this estimate

‘Sandy was classified a very unusual event, a once-in-a-century storm, but . . such storms could develop as often as every other year.’ This seems unnecessarily cryptic. I know what you mean but many of your readers may not. I think you should either cut this out or explain what it means.

Reply to this comment

By Camburn (North Dakota)
on May 4th, 2013

It is very doubtful, the every other year claim.  During the last phase of the warming, hurricanes declined.  The ACE values are very clear on this.

Reply to this comment

By Eric Peterson (Front Royal, VA 22630)
on May 4th, 2013

from the “every other year” link: Of the competing models, the top performer was one of the simplest. It relied on regional sea surface temperatures in the Atlantic Ocean hurricane birthing ground.

It is really wrong to project an increase in the number of storms from “once in a century” (which is wrong) to “every other year” based on sea surface temperatures.  This is because storms such as Sandy do not form based on sea surface temperatures.  The higher sea surface temperatures which were marginally higher probably made Sandy stronger at some point.  But the key point missing in the “every other year” article is that storms are formed by atmospheric dynamics, not temperature.  There are a lot of factors behind the formation of tropical cyclones, but as just one example the upper tropospheric wind shear is expected to increase under global warming.  That would suppress tropical cyclone formation and strengthening regardless of sea surface temperatures.

Reply to this comment

Name (required):
Email (required):
City/State/Zip:
Enter the word "climate" in the box below:

[+] View our comment guidelines.

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment will not appear until reviewed by Climate Central staff. Thank you for your patience.