News Section
Stories from Climate Central's Science Journalists and Content Partners

Halve Meat Consumption, Scientists Urge Rich World

Repost This

By Fiona Harvey, The Guardian

People in the rich world should become "demitarians" — eating half as much meat as usual, while stopping short of giving it up — in order to avoid severe environmental damage, scientists have urged, in the clearest picture yet of how farming practices are destroying the natural world.

They said the horsemeat scandal had uncovered the dark side of our lust for meat, which has fueled a trade in undocumented livestock and mislabeled cheap ready meals. "There is a food chain risk," said Prof Mark Sutton, who coined the term demitarian and is lead author of a U.N. Environment Programme (UNEP) study published on Monday. "Now is a good time to talk to people about this."

Beef carcasses at a wholesale meat market in Paris. 
Credit: Francois Mori/AP.

The quest for ever cheaper meat in the past few decades — most people even in rich countries ate significantly less meat one and two generations ago — has resulted in a massive expansion of intensively farmed livestock. This has diverted vast quantities of grain from human to animal consumption, requiring intensive use of fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides and, according to the UNEP report, "caused a web of water and air pollution that is damaging human health". The run-off from these chemicals is creating dead zones in the seas, causing toxic algal blooms and killing fish, while some are threatening bees, amphibians and sensitive ecosystems. "The attention this meat scare has drawn [highlights] poor quality meat. It shows society must think about livestock and food choices much more, for the environment and health," said Sutton.

The answer, Sutton said, was more vegetables on the plate, and less animal protein. "Eat meat, but less often — make it special," he urged. "Portion size is key. Many portions are too big, more than you want to eat. Think about a change of culture that says, 'I like the taste, but I don't need so much of it.'"

By filling plates with vegetables as well as the meat, people will be better nourished. "Most people don't notice," he said, citing a recent U.N. event at which the chef used a third the amount of meat, more vegetables to make up for it, and more than 90 percent of guests were just as satisfied.

Sutton was speaking about the rich west, the U.S. and Europe in particular. He wants the change in diet to be pioneered in Europe, as the U.S. will be a tougher nut to crack. The U.N. scientists said people in poor countries should be allowed to increase their consumption of animal protein, which billions of people are lacking. But if that is so as not to cause environmental harm, the move to meat in the developing world must be balanced with a reduction in the amount consumed in developed countries.

Chicken and pork are likely to be the meats that cause less environmental damage in relative terms, though standards of welfare and the circumstances in which livestock are raised can make a big difference. "Chicken is one of the most efficient [meats] as it grows very quickly and you can collect the manure," said Sutton. Meat production accounts for 80 percent of the nitrogen and phosphorus used in farming, according to the UNEP report, entitled Our Nutrient World: The challenge to produce more food and energy with less pollution. These nutrients are produced at great expense globally, but most of them end up wasted through the animals' manure. In some areas of the world, the nutrients are in short supply, resulting in lower crop yields.

UNEP warned: "Unless action is taken, increases in pollution and per capita consumption of energy and animal products will exacerbate nutrient losses, pollution levels and land degradation, further threatening the quality of our water, air and soils, affecting climate and biodiversity."

The report also set out a variety of measures by which farming could be made more environmentally friendly, from simple steps such as storing fertilizers more securely and using them more sparingly, and capturing greenhouse gas emissions from their production. Nitrogen use could be cut by 20 million tonnes by 2020, saving £110 billion a year ($168 billion). Reusing waste, such as manure, and treating sewage using modern methods would also save hundreds of billions.

Reprinted with permission from The Guardian.

Comments

By Judy (San Jose)
on November 20th, 2013

No. I think you should review the statistics and facts about how livestock contributes to climate change. Halving our meat consumption is NOT sustainable.  We have a limited time to address climate change, global depletion of limited resources, and current extinctions, among other things.

Please review the facts on:
—available land
—world population and trends
—current global slaughter and trends
—current global meat consumption and market trends
—the calculators that identify industry carbon and pollution foot prints
—resources (water, grain, energy, etc.)  required

All analysis should include the current consumption as well as projected future markets and scenarios.

Reply to this comment

Name (required):
Email (required):
City/State/Zip:
Enter the word "climate" in the box below:

[+] View our comment guidelines.

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment will not appear until reviewed by Climate Central staff. Thank you for your patience.