Nuclear Energy FAQs
Coinciding with the 24th anniversary of the Chernobyl nuclear reactor accident, Climate Central takes a fresh look at nuclear power, which is a low greenhouse gas electricity source that is garnering increased attention as one way to combat manmade climate change. Nuclear power tends to evoke strong opinions. Proponents point to nuclear’s low greenhouse gas emissions, its proven ability over the last 30 years to safely meet an important fraction of US electricity needs — about 20% today, and the readiness of the technology for an expansion. Opponents point to risks with reactor safety, radioactive waste disposal, and nuclear weapons proliferation. On reactor safety, it is probably not a stretch to say that another accident like Chernobyl or Three Mile Island would halt any expansion of the industry, regardless of the benefits.
On the other hand, the world has been operating hundreds of nuclear reactors year in and year out since Chernobyl without any serious accident, suggesting that the lessons of Chernobyl have been well learned. To help better understand the many facets of nuclear power, Climate Central interviewed Professor Alexander Glaser, a nuclear physicist at Princeton University who works on issues of nuclear energy and nuclear weapons.
Blog and Climopedia
- Chernobyl and Nuclear Energy: No Easy Answers
- Greenhouse gas emissions from nuclear electricity: low, but not zero
- Nuclear power in the future won't be too cheap to meter
- The costs for new nuclear power plants are uncertain





















Twitter Facebook YouTube Vimeo Pinterest RSS