A look at weather extremes and the big-picture climate connections.

Sea Level Rise May Add to Flood Risks at Seabrook Nuclear Plant

Repost This

This morning, New Hampshire's NPR radio station broadcast an interesting story about how the small town of Seabrook, N.H. is beginning to plan for sea level rise and the increased risk of devastating storm surges. With this part of the Northeast coast exposed to both sea level rise, which is currently happening at about 1.2 inches every decade (similar to the global average rate), as well as the and natural sinking of the coastal land (known as subsidence), the beach homes around Seabrook are now facing a creeping shoreline.

As NPR's Andrea Muraskin reports:

With funds from the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (DES), the Rockingham Planning Commission conducted a study two years ago in Seabrook. That study recommended Seabrook plan for a 3 to 5 feet mean sea level rise by the year 2100, and at least 1.5 feet by mid-century. Slowly, the town has started to take action.

Though sea level rise by itself may be enough to threaten some of the homes built directly on the beach, the real risk comes from what the higher water level means for storm surges from fall and winter storms, known in the area as "Nor'easters" due to their strong northeasterly winds. In the article, Muraskin interviewed Ted Diers, from the state's DES, who says:

Seabrook is starting to see 100 year floods more frequently. “It’s statistically significant that we’re getting more and more rain on fewer and fewer precipitation events. Where we sit here is particularly vulnerable at the interface between the ocean and these rivers. Because as these rivers have increasing flooding, and if we have increasing tidal surges, those together can really magnify to cause severe floods, and we’ve seen that in the Mother’s Day and the Patriots’ Day storms of late."

What Muraskin's report doesn't address is what sea level rise at Seabrook means for the nuclear power plant located just a couple miles inland from the coast. While much of the town's development is spread along a narrow sandy penninsula, there is also an extensive network of brackish and freshwater marshes extending westward from the coast. And on the far side of the wetlands lies the Seabrook Station nuclear power plant. Operated by NextEra Energy (a subsidiary of the Florida Power & Light company), the plant supplies power to more than 900,000 homes. 

The Seabrook Station nuclear power plant in Seabrook, N.H.. Credit: Wikimedia.

A few weeks ago, we reported on how sea level rise can increase the height of storm surges that could inundate coastal nuclear power plants in the U.S., and at the Turkey Point nuclear facility south of Miami, Fla., in particular. At Turkey Point, where two new reactors are currently being considered, sea level rise in the coming years will have an important influence on whether a storm surge brought in from a powerful hurricane will inundate the property. In the event of a major hurricane, for example, the safe operation of the nuclear plant could be threatened. We found that the utility company has not included calcuations of future sea level rise that are consistent with what most scientists say can be expected in southern Florida during the operating lifetime of the reactors. 

In New Hampshire, the risk is not so much from hurricanes, but from powerful Nor'easters that can also bring intense storm surges. However, Seabrook's property is much farther inland than some other nuclear plants, and has been elevated above 20 feet, leaving the plant far less vulnerable to storm surges, even with sea level rise. According to an analysis by Evergreen State College masters student Natalie Kopytko, even with the expected sea level rise towards the end of this century, it's unlikely the Seabrook Station will be completely inundated by a major storm.

On the other hand, with sea level rise during the next century, a powerful Nor'easter could cause flooding around the plant's property through a combination of a storm surge as well as river flooding from heavy rainfall, and Kopytko says, at Seabrook "changes in wave height and strength due to sea level rise and storms could become a concern in the future."

« Extreme Planet

Comments

By Steve Alexander (Wallingford/CT/06492)
on April 23rd, 2011

I remember when Seabrook was being debated before it was built. TMI wasn’t possible they said. Chernobyl would never happen. Now a Tsunami’s done it to Japan. OMG. I fish the waters of LI Sound and the sight of the Millstone Nuke Plant sticking out of Niantic Harbor in Watertown, CT is just frightening. As soon as you come out from under the RR bridge in a boat coming up the beautiful pristine Striped Bass laden harbor, it looms like a leviathan. Huge and surreal, and threatening. Moreso now since the events in Japan. Dr. Heidi Cullen(Ph.D.) of The Weather Channel and elsewhere is posting this article on Facebook.com today, and I thank her for that and for her public education efforts and for her own research on matters climatological. And the friendship and support to the environment of Heidi’s and her TWC colleague Stu Ostro, and former TWC staffer Dr. Steve Lyons. Peace… Steve Alexander

Reply to this comment

By aseeling (Buena Vista, Colorado 81211)
on April 27th, 2011

I remember in my first earth science class in 7th grade (1960), N Syracuse, NY, Mr. Erble, our teacher, told us that as the West Coast was rising out of the sea, the east coast was sinking.  He went on to show us pictures illustrating this.  At the time, we had no understanding of the whys and therefores, other than, if you are smart, you plan.

This was before the understanding of plate tectonics and the hysteria of climate change.  So, was he ahead of his time or are we just REALLY behind ours?

Reply to this comment

By Carolyn Foote Edelmann (Princeton NJ 08540)
on April 28th, 2011

How can we act as though sea level rise is happening only in one segment of one state of one country?!!!  Sea level rise is the norm.  Moving is not the vital answer.  Slowing CO2 emissions is!

Glaciers are melting at a tumultuous rate.  This changes not only sea level but also ph of the oceans, temperature of the oceans and therefore depths and energies of ocean currents.

Carolyn Foote Edelmann
Arts & Education Associate, D&R Greenway Land Trust
Packet Publications Nature Blog, NJ WILD

Reply to this comment

Name (required):
Email (required):
City/State/Zip:
Enter the word "climate" in the box below:

[+] View our comment guidelines.

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment will not appear until reviewed by Climate Central staff. Thank you for your patience.