A look at weather extremes and the big-picture climate connections.

New York’s One-Inch Escape From Hurricane Irene

Repost This
A taxi sits in flood water on Coney Island after Hurricane Irene hit New York, on August 28. Credit: Emmanuel Dunand/Getty Images/AP

New York City dodged a bullet with Hurricane Irene, but big trouble passed more closely than most people think. If the storm surge had pushed the waters of New York Harbor about one inch higher, it could have been enough to overcome some of Lower Manhattan’s outer defenses and flood the subway system, FDR Drive, the PATH and the Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel, if history is a guide.

At 8:42 AM on Sunday morning, close to the peak of an unusually tall high tide, the water reached 4.8 feet above the average high tide level, as measured by a gauge at the Battery. It was the sixth-highest level ever recorded for New York Harbor. The tallest mark came during a hurricane in 1821, at 6.5 feet. The most recent incident topping Irene was the December Nor’easter of 1992, which reached about one inch higher at the Battery and caused enough area flooding to shut down the entire subway system and PATH trains for several days. Unless the city has substantially raised its defenses since then, 4.8 feet put Irene in risky territory. (Check out Climate Central's map of NYC neighborhoods within five vertical feet of the high tide line.)

Lots of things could have tipped the balance this time, but didn’t. If Irene had moved more quickly, or blown more fiercely (she was downgraded to a Tropical Storm shortly before crossing over Manhattan). If she had arrived about 12 hours earlier, during a slightly higher tide. But perhaps the most important element shaping Irene’s outcome was the year she blew in.  

For more than a century, sea level has been creeping up, by about 16 inches since the Civil War and still rising. If the hurricane of 1821 had taken place today, it would have reached about 8 feet above the high tide line, obliterating all records — and a lot of infrastructure.

If Irene were to repeat in 2021 instead of 2011, we could very likely be writing a different story — because in 2021 the average sea level in New York Harbor will be an inch or so higher than it is today, assuming trends continue. 

So why is sea level rising? Mostly because of global warming, which is heating and expanding ocean water, and collapsing glaciers and ice sheets. In New York, the land is also slowly sinking by a few inches per century. 

Rising seas are a process well under way, not mere speculation. The New York State Sea Level Rise Task Force recently presented the state legislature with metro area sea level rise projections of seven to 29 inches by mid-century, and 12 to 55 inches by the 2080s. The large range of possibilities is due to uncertainty around how rapidly the great polar ice sheets will decay.

Sea level rise will amplify the impact of future hurricanes and Nor’easters. If we replay the 20th century but add an extra foot of sea level at the start (the extra foot we indeed started with in 2000, compared to 1900), about six events would produce higher water levels than the Nor’easter of 1992.

But this is a very conservative estimate, because it assumes that sea level will rise this century at the same pace it did last century — when in fact we expect much more.  If we crudely replay the 20th century but add an extra two feet of water at the start — overestimating floods early on but underestimating them later — we would see about 30 critical events. 

This is how coastal places everywhere will experience sea level rise: previously rare floods will become common — soon — and the new rare floods will be outside of anyone’s experience. It won’t be a matter of just waking up one day to find the high tide at your doorstep.

New York City workers piled sandbags on and around subway grates and other vulnerable areas. If Irene had crept much higher, these measures might not have prevented major damage.

The big lessons from Irene: invest in more significant defenses, and get a handle on climate change. If not, we will be measuring our future woes in feet, not inches.

« Extreme Planet

Comments

By Philip Orton (New York, NY, 10128)
on September 18th, 2011

Thanks for an interesting read.  Where did you get data on the water levels for the 1821 storm? 

All you ever read is about the 13-foot surge, and how it hit at low tide, but I’ve never seen data on the total water elevation.  That’s useful information, especially as you put it into context with the local relative sea level rise that has occurred since then.  Very fascinating.

Didn’t the PATH flood from seawater?  I believe it did, though there are some conflicting reports.  A friend was there in person, by the Hoboken PATH station, and claims it did flood.  Yet I was there the following morning, and saw little evidence of serious flooding down below ... no more than a few puddles, as you might expect from all the rainfall.  But it may simply be that they have found ways to close off the tunnels, which is something they were working on for fears of a repeat 1992-performance, or also fears of a PATH tunnel bombing.  So it isn’t clear if it did, but we’ll be learning more in the coming months ...

Reply to this comment

Name (required):
Email (required):
City/State/Zip:
Enter the word "climate" in the box below:

[+] View our comment guidelines.

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment will not appear until reviewed by Climate Central staff. Thank you for your patience.