Editorial viewpoints from Climate Central's writers and editors.

If A Tree Falls in the Senate, Will Anyone Hear Sea Rise?

Repost This

COMMENTARY
By Michael D. Lemonick


New Report: Sea Level Rise Threatens Hundreds of U.S. Energy Facilities (PDF)
Interactive Map: Surging Seas, Sea Level Rise Analysis
News: Senate Hearing Focuses on Threat of Sea Level Rise
Watch: Archived webcast of Senate hearing
Read: Senate testimony of five witnesses

If a tree falls in the forest and no one hears it, goes the question pondered by generations of college sophomores late at night, does it make a sound? Despite the noble intentions of Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.) in holding a hearing on sea level rise this week, the same question, only slightly modified, applies. Bingaman brought in five experts to testify at the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, including Climate Central’s Ben Strauss.

Six senators showed up — five Democrats and Republican Lisa Murkowski. And according to a liveblog on Daily Kos, six reporters showed up to cover it. And so despite dramatic (and scientifically rock-solid) statements like Strauss’s assertion that “rising seas raise the launch pad for coastal storm surges and tilt the odds toward disaster,” there’s a good chance that nobody will hear much about it.

On the other hand, climate hearings are awfully rare on Capitol Hill these days. And the number of senators and reporters at Thursday's hearing was nothing out of the ordinary. So if you want to look on the bright side, the fact that the Senate held a hearing on sea level rise offers at least a bit of hope that things could someday turn around.

Floodwaters and storm surges fueled by climate change will only get worse in the future, and there are already millions along the coastal U.S. imperiled by sea level rise. Coast Guard photograph by Petty Officer Robert M. Reed.

Of course, we thought the same thing back in 1988, when James Hansen electrified the nation with his own Senate testimony that “the evidence is pretty strong that the greenhouse effect is here.” In those days, global warming wasn’t nearly such a political hot potato, even though the evidence for it was far shakier than it is today. Legislators on both sides of the aisle took it seriously. As did the media and public.

Now, nearly a quarter of a century later, levels of heat-trapping carbon dioxide are about 12 percent higher than they were back then, and they’re still growing. That means that whatever action we take to curb emissions is going to be far tougher than it would have been all those years ago, and the time between now and disaster is much shorter.

The time is short, the task is enormous — and as anyone knows who’s been paying attention, the U.S. is not even close to taking it on. For anyone who hasn’t been paying attention, these hearings make it painfully clear: climate change isn’t high on the legislative agenda, and may not be for some time. Whenever that time comes, we can only hope it won't be too late to avoid the worst.

« Commentary

Comments

By Andrew
on April 20th, 2012

That’s a pretty dim bright side. smile

By Pete J. (Chesterfield, MO 63017)
on April 20th, 2012

Give them 20 years and they’ll have to start paying attention to climate change and sea level increase.  Ignorance of science is not going to be a defense that politicians can wield for much longer.  As evidence begins to pile up, bigger storms, greater coastal flooding, changes in oceanic currents, droughts, fires, etc,  and the cost of damages escalate… Money if nothing else, will force us to start paying attention, though it could very well be too late to spring into action by then.

As we speak, glaciers are flowing towards the sea at almost twice their “normal” speed, lubricated along the bedrock by melt water.  Once these glaciers reach the sea, and calve off into it, they melt in fairly short order, and they contain enough water to raise sea levels by several meters.  No longer should there be a question of IF sea levels will rise, but WHEN, and by how much.  By the end of this century, the world will look quite a bit different than we ever expected.

If voters in the US care about the changes happening around them, they have the duty to elect representatives who will address these concerns, or at the very least stop ignoring them.  Otherwise it’s a waiting game.

Name (required):
Email (required):
City/State/Zip:
Enter the word "climate" in the box below:

[+] View our comment guidelines.

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment will not appear until reviewed by Climate Central staff. Thank you for your patience.